Format of answer consistent with question requirements and KBS guidelines No efforts made to follow submission and editing, spacing, etc requirements. Meets most editing, spacing, fonts, and other editing requirements. Some requirements not met. Meets editing, spacing, fonts, and other editing requirements. Meets almost all editing, spacing, fonts, and other editing requirements. Meets all editing, spacing, fonts, and other editing requirements. /3 In-text referencing and reference list follows Harvard style and consistent with KBS guidelines Inappropriate referencing. Not in-line with requirements of Harvard style and consistent with KBS guidelines. Reasonably appropriate referencing, generally in-line with requirements of Harvard style and consistent with KBS guidelines. Good referencing, largely in- line with requirements of Harvard style and consistent with KBS guidelines. Very good referencing, 100% in-line with requirements of Harvard style and consistent with KBS guidelines.

Correct academic writing style used, including correct spelling, grammar and punctuation Needs more sentence variety. Little or no thought given to diction. Tone or language is conversational. Contains much informal language. Uses “I” or “you.” Contains many examples of unclear or awkward phrasing. Needs more sentence variety. Attention needed with diction. Contains informal language or conversational tone, or uses “I” or “you.” Unclear or awkward sentence phrasing. Sentence variety is adequate. Tone is appropriate. Diction is clear, but could be more effective. Language is academic, and writing is clear and effective. Very little or no unclear or awkward phrasing. Sentence variety is effective and good. Tone is appropriate and consistent. Diction/ vocabulary is appropriate and effective. Language is academic. Writing is clear, and concise. Sentence variety is effective and sophisticated. Tone is appropriate and consistent. Diction/ vocabulary is sophisticated and effective. Language is academic. Writing is clear, concise, and strong. /4

Appropriate theory and research used to answer question posed The critique does not have appropriate structure and lacks direction. No significant observations made from appropriate theory and research. Poor writing and expression of arguments. Reasonable critique which examines the relevant issues and makes reasonable observations made from appropriate theory and research. Reasonable writing and expression of arguments. Good critique examines the relevant issues and makes good observations from appropriate theory and research. Good writing and expression of arguments. A very good critique considered all the relevant issues and made important observations made from appropriate theory and research. Very good writing and expression of arguments. Fully considered all the relevant issues and made significant observations made from appropriate theory and research. Excellent writing and expression of arguments. /4

Answer clearly and logically presented Serious lack of organization. Body paragraphs do not refer back to or relate to main arguments. Writing is formulaic, i.e. “in conclusion,” “another example is….” Writing style could be more effective. Organization is hard to follow; there is little progression of ideas. Little or no transitions between paragraphs. Need to more effectively weave main arguments throughout and relate body paragraphs. Paragraphs are generally well organized. Better transitions needed. The progression of ideas could be more thoughtful. Paragraphs relate back to main arguments to prove argument. Ideas & arguments are well structured. Thoughtful progression of ideas and details. Sound transitions between paragraphs. Major arguments are effectively made. Ideas & arguments are effectively structured. Thoughtful progression of ideas and details. Excellent transitions between paragraphs. Concluding comments leave the reader thinking. Major arguments are effectively woven throughout everybody paragraph, with ideas always related back to main arguments. /4

Comprehensive Sustainability Assessment /30 understanding of case study Report demonstrates organization disclosure advanced level understanding obligations based on of management approach accurately identified topic disclosure methodology. specific disclosures - Highly detailed narrative attrition, discrimination, and explanation of topic specific community engagement. disclosures – attrition, Clear narrative explanation discrimination, and community using management engagement – together with approach disclosure accurate and total disclosure methodology. based on case study information.

Sustainability Assessment Sustainability Assessment Demonstrated understanding Topic specific disclosures - Social Sustainability Report demonstrates poor of case study organization attrition, discrimination, and understanding of disclosure obligations based community engagement – management approach on mostly accurately accurately identified from the disclosure methodology. identified topic specific case study and appropriately Failure to provide narrative disclosures - attrition, disclosed in Sustainability explanation of topic discrimination, and Assessment Report with specific disclosures. community engagement. reasonably clear narrative Substandard effort to Narrative explanation using explanation using make disclosures based management approach management approach on case study information. disclosure methodology but disclosure methodology. further work required to improve clarity of disclosure.

Sustainability Assessment Lack of understanding of Methodology of the Sustainability Assessment Methodology of the Effective adoption of /25 Environmental Sustainability disclosure requirements of management approach to Report indicates general management approach to management approach case study organization. disclosure appropriately used awareness and solid disclosure used well to disclosure methodology to Insufficient narrative to prepare logical narrative understanding of purpose of prepare detailed narrative provide complete topic specific explanation or explanations of topic specific disclosure and required explanations of topic specific disclosures – energy commentary of topic disclosures - energy methodology. Relevant disclosures - energy consumption, biodiversity, specific disclosures - consumption, biodiversity, details from case study are consumption, biodiversity, environmental law breaches – energy consumption, environmental law breaches. included within narrative environmental law breaches. relevant to case study biodiversity, environmental

CR (Credit) 65%-74% D (Distinction) 75% - 84% HD (High Distinction) 85%-100% Mark Assessment Content (Subject Specific) OUT OF 80 MARKS Topic specific disclosures - Comprehensive Sustainability Assessment /25 climate change, corruption, understanding of case study Report demonstrates advanced and anti-competitive organization disclosure level understanding of behavior – accurately obligations based on management approach identified from the case accurately identified topic disclosure methodology. Highly study and appropriately specific disclosures - climate detailed narrative explanation disclosed in Sustainability change, corruption, and anti- of topic specific disclosures – Assessment Report with competitive behavior. climate change, corruption, and reasonably clear narrative Clear narrative explanation anti-competitive behavior – explanation using using management approach together with accurate and total management approach disclosure methodology. disclosure based on case study disclosure methodology. information.

Subject Name: Governance, Ethics and Sustainability Assessment Title: Sustainability Assessment Weighting: 40% Total Marks: Page Limit: Due Date 100 6 pages Monday of Week 14, 11.55pm AEST Criteria F (Fail) 0%-49% P (Pass) 50%-64% Assessment Content (Subject Specific) OUT OF 80 MARKS Sustainability Assessment Sustainability Assessment Demonstrated understanding Economic Sustainability Report demonstrates poor of case study organization understanding of disclosure obligations based management approach on mostly accurately disclosure methodology. identified topic specific Failure to provide narrative disclosures - climate change, explanation of topic specific corruption, and anti- disclosures. Substandard competitive behavior. effort to make disclosures Narrative explanation using based on case study management approach information. disclosure methodology but further work required to improve clarity of disclosure.