This was a nice work. Though i thought that I wont get it in the mentioned time limit but I was wrong here, I got it even 1 hour before in this short deadline as well. I am very glad to have such expert here. This website is the best in all this industry. always helped me when i need it, alays on time with the best work .i will reccomend every studnet who needs help with their assignment work.i always got full grades by the help of this website ,almost finished my all study wwith your help guys. keep it up!

Dear Duty Officer, As the topic of the order placed, project #3 "China and/or Hong Kong meeting its obligations under the Paris Climate Agreement within the UNFCCC" is preferable for this assignment, please noted ONLY ONE project need to be choose in this assignment and there has no detail case study for all 3 projects. Please advise if the tutor think Project 1 or Project 2 is more suitable than Project 3. Thank you and have a nice day. Dear Duty Officer, Well noted. Please work on project 3. Thank you. Dear Duty Officer, Well received the completed assignment. May I know if I place a NEW order with the same assignment and same topic choosen, can you be able to ensure the newly ordered assignment will be different from the assignment you send to me today? Because I have a classmate would also like to buy your service with the same topic. Well noted. So I can use the link you provided for the new assignment with same topic and no need to place an other order? If yes, will process the payment shortly.

Marks were deducted if one or more of the above criteria were inadequately addressed. The comment(s) should be viewed as constructive feedback. They provide feedback indicating where your assignment could have been improved. More than 1 mark can be deducted for each criterion. The final mark is representative of your overall performance.

contain a quantified Tolerability of Risk (ToR) discussion and a ToR table quantify the risk exposure using relevant measures eg patron visits, no. of incidents, type and nature of incidents, change in patron usage... contain relevant and supportive discussion on risk management theory and practice include relevant literature review and discussion include Postgraduate level ‘value-added’ discussion (discussion goes beyond text and lecture material) show evidence that rigorous research was conducted be within the range of 3000-5000 words (exclusive of any Appendices) be referenced according to either IEEE or UTS referencing standards include a word count confirmation

be uploaded to Turnitin before the submission deadline be structured, formatted, professional and conform to recognised Report format include a relevant Executive Summary that captures the essence of your findings clearly establish the context, identify all the relevant stakeholders, and define system boundaries precisely clearly define the context discuss the societal benefits of this risk exposure correctly use the FMEA technique to identify, quantify and mitigate sources of risk use four (inclusive of FMEA) relevant risk assessment methods (see SA/SNZ HB 89) clearly present the risk tolerability criteria using examples and provide a detailed & relevant discussion

The assignment will be marked generally in accordance with the marking criteria where marks are deducted for non-conformity with these criteria. The assignment will be submitted as a soft copy. The assignment shall be uploaded to the 49006 Turnitin folder within UTSOnline. Please make sure to submit the complete assignment including Cover Page, Table of Contents, Reference list and Appendices. Emailed assignments will not be accepted. Be aware that several students have fallen foul, in previous semesters, of the sophisticated systems in place to detect plagiarism, whether of another student’s work or of books, internet resources, etc. You may use a revised version of a report you have prepared at work, as long as you clearly state the origins of your assignment and clearly delineate your contribution to this report. You should familiarise yourself with the correct referencing style – not referencing sources correctly can lead to a mark deduction, and not referencing sources at all (including pictures, diagrams, photographs) can be seen as plagiarism and can lead to disciplinary action.