you have to cover major things as below, 1-Explain the consequences of project delays, disruptions, and changes to planned activities and the methods for claims variations, liquidated damages, contract entitlements, and arbitration. 2-Evaluate project management tools that help avoid or provide conflict resolution via negotiated solutions I want this assignment before 3 pm tomorrow I have this material 27051878_1PPMP20011 Lecture Week 7 v01a.pdf 27051846_2PPMP20011 Lecture Week 7 v01a.mp4 27051828_3PPMP20011 Practical Assessment 1 Projects Negotiation and Conflict Report v01a.pdf Instructions for Practical Assessment 2: Please study the following Projects Claims and Damages Report - Template by reading carefully the Guidance Boxes in the template. Note: this report is a continuation of the Project Negotiation and Conflict Report. 27051825_1PPMP20011 Lecture Week 4 v01a.pdf 27051825_2PPMP20011 Lecture Week 3 v01a.pdf 27051888_1archive.zip27051858_1PPMP20011 Lecture Week 6 v01a.pdf

you have to make a accurate assignment. you have to make assignment as per the marking criteria provided and have to use my first assignment as well. I am attaching my first assignment and comment of our tutor on it. Make a assignment after refering the queensland health payroll report I have sent to you. make a assignment in templet which I have sent you. make sure you make a good assignment as per requirement. This is my 1st assignment so look on the comment of tutor and correct that mistake and then make a second assignment. 27051857_1Ass 1 Rohit Patel 212045267.docx 27051825_2PPMP20011 Negotiation Conflict Marking 1.xlsx You have to use mostly Walker and Walkers book for project management

Appropriate and well structured, concise and clear expression of project management requirements in response to the assessment task? (10%) 10 Clarity of expression, grammar and spelling? (10%) 10 Total 100 0

3rd Criteria 3. Does the section or topic demonstrate awareness and understanding of deeper and less obvious aspects of the course, such as ability to identify and debate critical issues or problems, ability to solve non-routine problems, ability to adapt and apply ideas to new situations, and ability to invent and evaluate new ideas? (75%) 7.5 4th Criteria "4. Has the section or topic been presented with imagination, originality or flair, based on proficiency in all the relevant learning outcomes of the course; work is interesting or surprisingly exciting, challenging, well read or scholarly? (100%) " 7.5

The project management tools proposed to help avoid or provide conflict resolution via negotiated solutions is an accurate reflection of the requirements outlined in the case study? (30%) 1st Criteria Does the section or topic meet all of the basic learning requirements relevant of the course, such as knowledge of fundamental concepts and performance of basic skills; demonstrates sufficient quality of performance to be considered satisfactory or adequate or competent or capable in relation to the learning outcomes of the assignment? (25%) 7.5 2nd Criteria 2. Does the section or topic reflect an ability to use and apply fundamental concepts and skills of the course, going beyond mere replication of content knowledge or skill to show understanding of key ideas, awareness of their relevance, some use of analytical skills, and some originality or insight? (50%) 7.5

3rd Criteria 3. Does the section or topic demonstrate awareness and understanding of deeper and less obvious aspects of the course, such as ability to identify and debate critical issues or problems, ability to solve non-routine problems, ability to adapt and apply ideas to new situations, and ability to invent and evaluate new ideas? (75%) 7.5 4th Criteria "4. Has the section or topic been presented with imagination, originality or flair, based on proficiency in all the relevant learning outcomes of the course; work is interesting or surprisingly exciting, challenging, well read or scholarly? (100%) " 7.5

The proposals for mitigating the consequences of project delays, disruptions, and changes to planned activities and the methods for claims variations, liquidated damages,contract entitlements, and arbitration is an accurate reflection of the requirements outlined in the case study? (30%) 1st Criteria Does the section or topic meet all of the basic learning requirements relevant of the course, such as knowledge of fundamental concepts and performance of basic skills; demonstrates sufficient quality of performance to be considered satisfactory or adequate or competent or capable in relation to the learning outcomes of the assignment? (25%) 7.5 2nd Criteria 2. Does the section or topic reflect an ability to use and apply fundamental concepts and skills of the course, going beyond mere replication of content knowledge or skill to show understanding of key ideas, awareness of their relevance, some use of analytical skills, and some originality or insight? (50%) 7.5

6 2.2.1 1. Motivation and Context: Technical KSAE 7 2.2.1 1. Motivation and Context: Project Management KSAE 8 2.2.1 1. Motivation and Context: Business Solution KSAE 9 2.2.1 1. Motivation and Context: Relational KSAE 10 2.2.1 2. Joint Governance structure: Technical KSAE 11 2.2.1 2. Joint Governance structure: Project Management KSAE 12 2.2.1 2. Joint Governance structure: Business Solution KSAE 13 2.2.1 2. Joint Governance structure: Relational KSAE 14 2.2.1 3. Integrated Risk Mitigation Strategy: Technical KSAE 15 2.2.1 3. Integrated Risk Mitigation Strategy: Project Management KSAE 16 2.2.1 3. Integrated Risk Mitigation Strategy: Business Solution KSAE

PPMP20011 Practical Assessment 2: Projects Claims and Damages Report Sudent Name and Number: Possible Documentation (20%) 1 1. Guidance Box Deleted 1 2 1. Program Information 1 3 1. Second Guidance Box Deleted 1 4 2. Guidance Box Deleted 1 5 2. Project 1: Forward strategy for payroll system referal back to the first practical assessment 4