I have attached file. its project schedule assignment so you need to use require software to make gant chart and other require graph and also you need to make assignment as per the case senario which given into requirement file. thanks

Format of answer consistent with question requirements and KBS guidelines. Word count is within + / - 10% of requirement. Does not comply with KBS guidelines. Major layout errors. Breaches word limit restrictions. Mostly compliant with KBS guidelines. Basic formatting with some layout errors. Compliant with word limit restrictions. Complies with KBS guidelines. Format generally sound. Compliant with word limit restrictions. Exceeds basic compliance with KBS guidelines. Format portrays information well. Compliant with word limit restrictions. Exceeds basic compliance with KBS guidelines. Format presents information clearly and concisely. Compliant with word limit restrictions.

Correct academic writing style used, including correct spelling, grammar and punctuation. Writing style is unclear; lacks logical flow and structure; numerous spelling grammatical errors. Writing style lacks some clarity; some flaws in logical flow and structure; some use of discipline specific academic language. Several spelling or grammatical errors. Writing style is mostly clear; Mostly written in discipline specific academic language; Some spelling or grammatical errors. Writing style is clear; Correct use of discipline specific academic language. Some minor spelling or grammatical errors. Writing style is clear; Fluent use of discipline specific academic language. No spelling or grammatical errors.

Report clearly and logically written. Appropriate theory and research used to answer question posed. Lacks logical flow and structure; Argument supported by theory sourced from non-academic literature. No discussion of academic research. Cites very few sources. Some errors in logical flow and structure; Argument supported by basic discussion of relevant theory sourced from a minimal number of academic sources. Little if any discussion of relevant research. Generally sound logical flow and structure; Argument supported by broad discussion of relevant theory sourced from academic literature. Relevant research acknowledged but not discussed. Cites several academic sources. Very good logical flow and structure; Argument supported by detailed discussion of relevant theory and research sourced from numerous academic sources. Excellent logical flow and structure; Argument supported by comprehensive discussion of relevant theory and research sourced from numerous quality academic sources.

Personal reflection on the process The reflection does not move beyond a description of the learning experience. The reflection attempts to analyse the learning experience, but the value of the learning to the student or others is vague and/or unclear. The reflection analyses many of the learning episodes and makes several connections to how the learning can be applied to self or others. The reflection is an analysis of the learning experience and the value of the derived learning to self or others. The reflection is an in-depth analysis of the learning experience, the value of the derived learning to self or others, and the enhancement of the student’s appreciation for the discipline.

Report (brief) The criteria for the brief have lack thoughtful consideration. The assumptions demonstrate insufficient thinking. The criteria for the brief are basic and require more consideration. The assumptions demonstrate a basic level of thinking. The criteria for the brief have been well considered. The assumptions demonstrate a solid level of thinking. The criteria for the brief show thoughtful consideration. The assumptions demonstrate considered thinking. The criteria for the brief show comprehensive and thoughtful consideration. The assumptions demonstrate depth of thinking.

Project schedule and Gantt chart; as indicated by the final result and the adjustments made The project schedule is limited, may not be workable and is unclear. Understanding of project scheduling is limited. The project schedule is basic, contains a few issues and lacks clarity. Demonstration of basic level understanding of project scheduling. The project schedule is solid, mostly workable and clear. Demonstration of solid level understanding of scheduling. The project schedule has been well considered, is workable and clear. Demonstration of high level understanding of project scheduling. The project schedule is comprehensive, workable and is easy to follow. Demonstration of advanced level understanding of project scheduling

Criteria F (Fail) 0%-49% P (Pass) 50%-64% CR (Credit) 65%-74% D (Distinction) 75% - 84% HD (High Distinction) 85%-100% Milestone Plan and task list (WBS) Few specific milestones and tasks identified and described. Allocation of tasks to persons does not fit the brief. Sufficient milestones and tasks prepared identifying and describing the main objectives of the brief. Allocation of tasks to persons fits with the brief. Ample milestones and tasks prepared identifying and describing all the objectives of the brief. Allocation of tasks to persons fits with the brief and has been well considered. Broad milestones and tasks prepared identifying and describing specific milestones and tasks. Allocation of tasks to persons shows depth of thinking. Comprehensive milestones and tasks prepared identifying and describing specific milestones and tasks. Allocation of tasks to persons is comprehensive and shows depth of thinking.