Reference no: EM13850167
Peter has been a non-executive director of Snappy Robots Ltd (SR) since 2007. Peter is inexperienced, but was appointed as a director because he is the son in law of a major shareholder of SR. While he is not very experienced, Peter has finished his Bachelor of Commerce degree, majoring in Accounting, and has been working as an accountant for the last three years.
Several years ago, SR decided to acquire Wealthy Ltd, a company specialising in making robotic limbs for human use. Peter, as director, considered this to be a very profitable opportunity for SR. In forming this opinion, Peter had read a lengthy report (over 300 pages long) that was written by SR's Chief Financial Officer. Because Peter was busy studying for his CPA exams, he did not notice that the report indicated (at page 257) that the company was experiencing a decline in sales of robotic limbs. Also contained in the report (at page 165) was a recommendation that SR obtain an independent verification of the robot technology before proceeding with the acquisition.
Peter did not seek an independent verification of the value of the technology. In fact, Peter only read the first few pages of the report which suggested that Wealthy, generally, appeared to be in a strong financial position, and on that basis convinced the other board members (mainly due to his relationship with the major shareholder) to go ahead with the acquisition of Wealthy.
The acquisition proves to be a financial disaster and the robotic limb technology was significantly overvalued. As a result, SR becomes insolvent. A liquidator has now been appointed and has suggested that Peter has breached his duty as a director.
Advise Peter whether he has breached his duty under s 180, including whether there are any defenses that he can argue.
Permanent increase raises the labor force
: Use the long-run model from Chapter 3 the answer this question. Suppose there is a permanent increase raises the labor force (L).
|
What position does justice white advance
: What position does Justice White advance in his concurring opinion in Katz v. United States? Is it consistent with his view of the Fourth Amendment that we find in his opinion in Chimel v. California? How? Explain.
|
It is argued that the exclusionary rule was invoked
: It is argued that the exclusionary rule was invoked by the Supreme Court because there was no other effective remedy to deter police misconduct. Does this still apply in today's legal environment?
|
Find the equity beta for this firm for debt–equity ratios
: Suppose a firm’s business operations mirror movements in the economy as a whole very closely—that is, the firm’s asset beta is 1. Find the equity beta for this firm for debt–equity ratios of 0, 1.6, 6.2, and 25.
|
Peter has been a non-executive director of snappy
: Peter has been a non-executive director of Snappy Robots Ltd (SR) since 2007. Peter is inexperienced, but was appointed as a director because he is the son in law of a major shareholder of SR. While he is not very experienced, Peter has finished his ..
|
Make monthly deposits into retirement account
: You are planning to make monthly deposits of $480 into a retirement account that pays 8 percent interest compounded monthly. If your first deposit will be made one month from now, how large will your retirement account be in 25 years?
|
Solve the given ethics issues
: You are the claims supervisor of XYZ Company reporting to the Regional Vice President of Claims at the same branch. On Tuesday morning, you learn that one of your staff, Bill, died the night before in a one-car accident
|
Interest rate on that bond
: 1. Suppose the price of a bond is initially $900 but increases to $950. What is happening to the interest rate on that bond?
|
Calculate gain or loss on disposal-fixed depreciation
: Genetic Insights Co. purchases an asset for $11,645. This asset qualifies as a seven-year recovery asset under MACRS. The seven-year fixed depreciation percentages for years 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 are 14.29%, 24.49%, 17.49%, 12.49%, 8.93%, and 8.93%, r..
|