Response to questions (50%) Completely accurate responses and responses are well in line with developed report Good responses with little inaccuracy but are not completely in line with developed report Average responses that meet expectation but mostly are not in line with developed report No responses or responses are completely inaccurate and don’t represent the work submitted Total

Financial Assets and Markets Group Project-oral defense (10%) Rubrics Component Outstanding (87 and above) Good (75-86) Average (60-75) Below Average (Below 60) Score Overall presentation quality (50%) Excellent demonstration of the work with brief coverage of all contents .Well organized slides and handouts Good knowledge and presentation skills shown but did not exhibit complete command over subject matter. Little disorganization was found in slides and handouts Shows some knowledge of subject matter with average presentation skills but slides and handouts are difficult to follow No presentation or shows critical weakness in knowledge of subject matter with poorly organized presentation

Analytical thinking and Judgment (40%) Excellent integration and use of information, and relevant concepts to reach on findings and conclusion Appropriate integration and use of information, and relevant concepts to reach on findings and conclusion but ignores some knowledge and facts Satisfactory integration and use of information, and relevant concepts to reach on findings and conclusion but ignores important knowledge and facts Inadequate or inappropriate or illogical integration and use of information and ignores significant body of relevant knowledge and facts Practicality and suitability of Recommendations (15%) All Suggestions and recommendations are aligned with given findings, facts, real market situations and environment

Financial Assets and Markets Group Project submission (20%) Rubrics Component Excellent (87 and above) Good (75-86) Satisfactory (60-74) Unacceptable Below 60 Information and data collection (35%) Data and Information is collectedfrom many and research based sources Data and Information is collected from multiple sources Data and Information is collected from a very limited number of sources No work done or Data/information is collected from a single source Use of primary sources (10%) Interviewed severalindustry experts and researchers such as dealers, brokers, investors, DFM officialsand finance faculty on crisis, risks and challenges faced by investors at DFM Interviewed at least one industry expert and one researcher such as dealers, brokers, investors, DFM officials and finance faculty on crisis, risks and challenges faced by investors at DFM Interviewed one industry expert or one researcher such as dealers, brokers, investors, DFM officials and finance faculty on crisis, risks and challenges faced by investors at DFM No interview or no interview scripts and contact details of interviewees are attached with report

Assessment Strategy: Group work Marks Literature review 40 Integration and Critique 30 Recommendations 20 Referencing and technical finishing 10 Total marks 100 Financial Assets and Markets Group Project submission (20%) Rubrics Component Excellent (87 and above) Good (75-86) Satisfactory (60-74) Unacceptable Below 60 Information and data collection (35%) Data and Information is collectedfrom many and research based sources Data and Information is collected from multiple sources Data and Information is collected from a very limited number of sources No work done or Data/information is collected from a single source