Reference no: EM132379582
Assessment - Performance Evaluation and Video Presentation
Your task
Prepare a 15 minute video recording during which you evaluate the three case studies included below:
• Project A - DeGrandis Running Shoes
• Project B - Australian Olympic Committee (AOC) Partnership
• Project C - Ladybird Sporting Apparel
Assessment Description
In your Performance Evaluation Video Presentation, you must evaluate the performance of each of the three projects and provide the following:
a) Commentary on project alignment with strategic goals and ethical standards
b) A Project Performance Scorecard (PPS) Snapshot
c) Conclusions
d) Recommendations
A PowerPoint template is provided for you to use in your video presentation if you wish. There is no requirement to use this template.
Assessment Instructions
Assessment 3 Case Study - DeGrandis Sporting Goods
1. Project A - DeGrandis Running Shoes
Project A introduced the DeGrandis private label running shoe to the company's product range. Although the project ran over budget, the project team successfully developed a new sole cushioning technology and delivered a brand-new shoe within the project timeframe. Customers love the new shoes - they are outselling rival international brands - and sales have increased company revenues by over $5 million. The editor of online running shoe reviewer Shoe News has given the running shoes a 5 out of 5-star rating.
But not everybody is so thrilled with the project's outcomes. The board of directors is unhappy that the project team did not consult them about the Chinese organisation selected to manufacture and supply the shoes. Had the directors known that the Chinese supplier uses child labour in their factory they would not have approved the supply agreement because engaging partners that rely on child labour is prohibited under the company's Code of Conduct. The consultants are managed by regional managers in each city.
2. Project B - Australian Olympic Committee (AOC) Partnership
The primary objective of Project B was for DeGrandis Sporting Goods to become an official supplier of sporting equipment to the Australian Olympic Team. At the outset all key stakeholders were identified and consulted and a comprehensive list of project requirements was developed based on stakeholder needs. Apart from the project running six months over the scheduled project timeframe, every other project requirement was successfully met. The new partnership was established and sales are estimated to have increased by over $3 million.
The project was considered a resounding success until it emerged that the project sponsor, a member of the DeGrandis senior executive team, had paid a high-ranking AOC official an incentive payment to approve the partnership. The press learned of the bribe and the incident became a public scandal. DeGrandis Sporting Goods suffered reputational damage as the company's Code of Conduct expressly prohibits the payment of bribes to generate business. An extensive marketing campaign originally developed to promote the partnership has been cancelled because it would only draw more attention to the bribery scandal.
3. Project C - Ladybird Sporting Apparel
Project C successfully introduced the environmentally friendly and internationally known Ladybird brand of sporting apparel to the DeGrandis Sporting Goods product range. Although fundamental project requirements such as project timeframe and budget were met, the new line of clothing was not properly market tested prior to the product line launch. It turns out that customers consider the Ladybird clothing range to be inferior in quality and customer complaints have increased as a result.
DeGrandis Sporting Goods have ceased ordering new stock from Ladybird due to poor sales and increasing customer dissatisfaction.
You are required to use at least 15 sources of information and use Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style. Wikipedia and other ‘popular' sites are not to be used.
Attachment:- Strategic Project Management.rar
BFA221 Accounting Information Systems Assignment
: BFA221 Accounting Information Systems Assignment Help and Solution, Semester 2, University of Tasmania, Australia - Evaluate the internal control of the picking
|
Tinker home security-create matrix that lists each business
: Create a matrix that lists each business, and compare and contrast your personal liability exposure as an owner as a result of the lawsuit.
|
Identify and define the 5 steps of marketing research
: Explain the difference between internal and external secondary data. Discuss fully the advantages and disadvantages of secondary data.
|
Why are investments shown as current assets
: What method does the company use to depreciate its property and equipment? Explain the current liability "Accrued and other current liabilities."
|
Performance evaluation and video presentation assignment
: Performance Evaluation and Video Presentation Assignment help and solution, evaluate the performance of each of the three projects.
|
Defendant and the trial court held in favor of plaintiff
: The Plaintiff sued the Defendant and the trial court held in favor of Plaintiff, finding negligence on the part of the worker in knocking the cover into the vat
|
What amounts relative to the 2017 television warranties
: What amounts relative to the 2017 television warranties would appear on the December 31, 2018, balance sheet and how would they be classified?
|
Prepare rowans entries to record the purchase of jbi shares
: Prepare Rowan's entries to record the purchase of JBI shares, the receipt of its share of JBI dividends and the December 31 year-end adjustment.
|
How much were net purchases and cost of goods available
: Using the standard inventory formula, and considering the information contained in Best Buy Co. financial statements, how much were net purchases.
|