Performance evaluation and video presentation assignment

Assignment Help Project Management
Reference no: EM132379582

Assessment - Performance Evaluation and Video Presentation

Your task

Prepare a 15 minute video recording during which you evaluate the three case studies included below:
• Project A - DeGrandis Running Shoes
• Project B - Australian Olympic Committee (AOC) Partnership
• Project C - Ladybird Sporting Apparel

Assessment Description
In your Performance Evaluation Video Presentation, you must evaluate the performance of each of the three projects and provide the following:

a) Commentary on project alignment with strategic goals and ethical standards
b) A Project Performance Scorecard (PPS) Snapshot
c) Conclusions
d) Recommendations

A PowerPoint template is provided for you to use in your video presentation if you wish. There is no requirement to use this template.

Assessment Instructions

Assessment 3 Case Study - DeGrandis Sporting Goods

1. Project A - DeGrandis Running Shoes

Project A introduced the DeGrandis private label running shoe to the company's product range. Although the project ran over budget, the project team successfully developed a new sole cushioning technology and delivered a brand-new shoe within the project timeframe. Customers love the new shoes - they are outselling rival international brands - and sales have increased company revenues by over $5 million. The editor of online running shoe reviewer Shoe News has given the running shoes a 5 out of 5-star rating.

But not everybody is so thrilled with the project's outcomes. The board of directors is unhappy that the project team did not consult them about the Chinese organisation selected to manufacture and supply the shoes. Had the directors known that the Chinese supplier uses child labour in their factory they would not have approved the supply agreement because engaging partners that rely on child labour is prohibited under the company's Code of Conduct. The consultants are managed by regional managers in each city.

2. Project B - Australian Olympic Committee (AOC) Partnership

The primary objective of Project B was for DeGrandis Sporting Goods to become an official supplier of sporting equipment to the Australian Olympic Team. At the outset all key stakeholders were identified and consulted and a comprehensive list of project requirements was developed based on stakeholder needs. Apart from the project running six months over the scheduled project timeframe, every other project requirement was successfully met. The new partnership was established and sales are estimated to have increased by over $3 million.

The project was considered a resounding success until it emerged that the project sponsor, a member of the DeGrandis senior executive team, had paid a high-ranking AOC official an incentive payment to approve the partnership. The press learned of the bribe and the incident became a public scandal. DeGrandis Sporting Goods suffered reputational damage as the company's Code of Conduct expressly prohibits the payment of bribes to generate business. An extensive marketing campaign originally developed to promote the partnership has been cancelled because it would only draw more attention to the bribery scandal.

3. Project C - Ladybird Sporting Apparel

Project C successfully introduced the environmentally friendly and internationally known Ladybird brand of sporting apparel to the DeGrandis Sporting Goods product range. Although fundamental project requirements such as project timeframe and budget were met, the new line of clothing was not properly market tested prior to the product line launch. It turns out that customers consider the Ladybird clothing range to be inferior in quality and customer complaints have increased as a result.

DeGrandis Sporting Goods have ceased ordering new stock from Ladybird due to poor sales and increasing customer dissatisfaction.

You are required to use at least 15 sources of information and use Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style. Wikipedia and other ‘popular' sites are not to be used.

Attachment:- Strategic Project Management.rar

Verified Expert

The ppt is on three different projects of De Grandis. Performance score cards are investigated along with the strategic recommendations. Each of these projects are presented with alignment with goals, conclusions and recommendations. Further there is script presented for the ppt presentation. References given in bibliography.

Reference no: EM132379582

Questions Cloud

BFA221 Accounting Information Systems Assignment : BFA221 Accounting Information Systems Assignment Help and Solution, Semester 2, University of Tasmania, Australia - Evaluate the internal control of the picking
Tinker home security-create matrix that lists each business : Create a matrix that lists each business, and compare and contrast your personal liability exposure as an owner as a result of the lawsuit.
Identify and define the 5 steps of marketing research : Explain the difference between internal and external secondary data. Discuss fully the advantages and disadvantages of secondary data.
Why are investments shown as current assets : What method does the company use to depreciate its property and equipment? Explain the current liability "Accrued and other current liabilities."
Performance evaluation and video presentation assignment : Performance Evaluation and Video Presentation Assignment help and solution, evaluate the performance of each of the three projects.
Defendant and the trial court held in favor of plaintiff : The Plaintiff sued the Defendant and the trial court held in favor of Plaintiff, finding negligence on the part of the worker in knocking the cover into the vat
What amounts relative to the 2017 television warranties : What amounts relative to the 2017 television warranties would appear on the December 31, 2018, balance sheet and how would they be classified?
Prepare rowans entries to record the purchase of jbi shares : Prepare Rowan's entries to record the purchase of JBI shares, the receipt of its share of JBI dividends and the December 31 year-end adjustment.
How much were net purchases and cost of goods available : Using the standard inventory formula, and considering the information contained in Best Buy Co. financial statements, how much were net purchases.

Reviews

len2379582

10/1/2019 12:26:48 AM

Please include minimum 3 recommendations in each A,B,C Points. And i need the cript also For video presentation for 15 mins and adjust the slides according to time.

len2379582

10/1/2019 12:26:29 AM

Correct academic writing style used, including correct spelling, grammar and punctuation Needs more sentence variety. Little or no thought given to diction. Tone or language is conversational. Contains much informal language. Uses “I” or “you.” Contains many examples of unclear or awkward phrasing. Needs more sentence variety. Attention needed with diction. Contains informal language or conversational tone or uses “I” or “you.” Unclear or awkward sentence phrasing. Sentence variety is adequate. Tone is appropriate. Diction is clear but could be more effective. Language is academic, and writing is clear and effective. Very little or no unclear or awkward phrasing. Sentence variety is effective and good. Tone is appropriate and consistent. Diction/ vocabulary is appropriate and effective. Language is academic. Writing is clear and concise. Sentence variety is effective and sophisticated. Tone is appropriate and consistent. Diction/ vocabulary is sophisticated and effective. Language is academically sound. Writing is clear, concise, and strong. /1

len2379582

10/1/2019 12:26:15 AM

Appropriate theory and research used to answer question posed The critique does not have appropriate structure and lacks direction. No significant observations made from appropriate theory and research. Poor writing and expression of arguments. Reasonable critique which examines the relevant issues and makes reasonable observations made from appropriate theory and research. Reasonable writing and expression of arguments. Good critique examines the relevant issues and makes good observations from appropriate theory and research. Good writing and expression of arguments. A very good critique -considers all the relevant issues and makes important observations from appropriate theory and research. Very good writing and expression of arguments. Fully considers all the relevant issues and makes significant observations from appropriate theory and research. Excellent writing and expression of arguments. /1

len2379582

10/1/2019 12:26:10 AM

Criteria F (Fail) 0%-49% P (Pass) 50%-64% CR (Credit) 65%- 74% D (Distinction) 75% - 84% HD (High Distinction) 85%-100% Mark Answer clearly and logically presented Serious lack of organization. Content of slides or notes pages does not refer back to or relate to main arguments. Writing is formulaic, i.e. “in conclusion,” “another example is….” Writing style could be more effective. Organization is hard to follow; there is little progression of ideas. Little or no transitions between slides. Need to more effectively weave main arguments throughout. Slides are generally well organized. Better transitions needed. The progression of ideas could be more thoughtful. Slides and note relate back to main arguments to prove argument.

len2379582

10/1/2019 12:25:48 AM

Performance Evaluation Video Presentation Recommendations Recommendations demonstrate poor understanding of strategic project management concepts. Explanations for commendations not provided or unclear or illogical. Recommendations demonstrate reasonable understanding of strategic project management concepts. Meaningful explanations for appropriate recommendations provided in mostly comprehensible language. Recommendations demonstrate solid understanding of strategic project management concepts. Relevant explanations for logical recommendations provided in comprehensible language. Recommendations demonstrate comprehensive understanding of strategic project management concepts. Proficient explanations for effective recommendations provided in clear language. Recommendations demonstrate advanced level understanding of strategic project management concepts. Detailed explanations for innovative recommendations provided in clear and concise language. /6

len2379582

10/1/2019 12:25:42 AM

Performance Evaluation Video Presentation Conclusions Conclusions demonstrate poor understanding of strategic project management concepts. Explanations for conclusions not provided or unclear or illogical. Conclusions demonstrate reasonable understanding of strategic project management concepts. Meaningful explanations for appropriate conclusions provided in mostly comprehensible language. Conclusions demonstrate solid understanding of strategic project management concepts. Relevant explanations for logical conclusions provided in comprehensible language. Conclusions demonstrate comprehensive understanding of strategic project management concepts. Proficient explanations for effective conclusions provided in clear language. Conclusions demonstrate advance level understanding of strategic project management concepts. Detailed explanations for insightful conclusions provided in clear and concise language. /6

len2379582

10/1/2019 12:25:37 AM

Performance Evaluation Video Presentation Project Performance Scorecard (PPS) Project Performance Scorecard (PPS) either unclear or not used at all indicating poor understanding of project performance evaluation model. Demonstrated understanding of project performance evaluation model. Project Performance Scorecard (PPS) is reasonably clear and incorporates the essential features of the basic model. Project Performance Scorecard (PPS) correctly used to accurately score and explain PPS Dimensions indicating strong understanding of project performance evaluation model. Comprehensive understanding of project performance evaluation model evident from highly accurate scoring and explanation of PPS Dimensions in Project Performance Scorecard (PPS) Demonstrated advanced level understanding of project performance evaluation model. Project Performance Scorecard (PPS) is clear, easy to interpret and incorporates features that go beyond the basic model. /6

len2379582

10/1/2019 12:25:32 AM

Criteria F (Fail) 0%-49% P (Pass) 50%-64% CR (Credit) 65%- 74% D (Distinction) 75% - 84% HD (High Distinction) 85%-100% Mark Performance Evaluation Video Presentation Strategy & Ethics Brief and inaccurate analysis indicating poor understanding strategic project management concepts. Demonstrated understanding of strategic project management concepts. Mostly accurate analysis based upon appropriately identified strategic goals and ethical standards. Meaningful analysis based upon accurately identified strategic goals and ethical standards indicating strong understanding of strategic project management concepts. Comprehensive understanding of strategic project management concepts evident from highly accurate analysis incorporating all relevant strategic goals and ethical standards. Demonstrated advanced level understanding of strategic project management concepts. Analysis is penetrating and insightful with findings that go beyond fundamental strategic goals and ethical standards outlined in the case study. /6

Write a Review

Project Management Questions & Answers

  Create a project schedule and align resources

Create a project schedule and align resources, Analyze project schedule and resource allocation

  Managerial roles and gap analysis

Write a report on Managerial Roles and Gap Analysis

  Questionaire on project management

Questionaire on Project Management

  Describe the market growth rate for product

Describe the market growth rate for product and service.

  Prepare a work plan and project schedule - gantt chart

Design an online system for the human resources department to manage available job positions.

  Project risk management approach

How does a project risk management approach pro-vide an early warning signal for impending problems or issues

  Black-scholes options pricing model

Calculate the payoff and the profits for investments

  Describe the features or characteristics of product

Describe the features or characteristics of your product or service.

  Write paper on inventory management system

Write paper on Inventory Management System.

  Analysis of the overall project risk

Analysis of the overall project risk

  Investment and performance analysis

Evaluate the usefulness of ROCE

  Distribution strategy and project management

Distribution strategy and project management

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd