Peoplesoft leave the market too concentrated

Assignment Help Operation Management

Reference no: EM132193548

Oracle Corporation makes extremely complicated and large cus- tomized software programs that can support thousands of simultaneous users and that are capable of administering the personnel records and financial records of very large businesses (called enterprise software). PeopleSoft and SAP were the only two other major competitors making such massive enterprise software. Oracle held 18 percent of the market in customized software capable of handling the personnel records of very large businesses, SAP held 29 percent, and PeopleSoft held 51.5 per- cent. Moreover, Oracle held 17 percent, SAP held 39 percent, and PeopleSoft held 31 percent of the market for customized software capable of managing the financial records of very large businesses. On June 6, 2003, Oracle attempted a hostile take- over of PeopleSoft by offering to buy PeopleSoft’s shares for $5.1 billion, or $16 a share. PeopleSoft’s board of directors rejected Oracle’s offer, and on June 18 Oracle raised its bid to $6.3 billion, or $19.50 per share. Then, on February 4, 2004, Oracle raised its offer to $9.4 billion, or $26 per share. PeopleSoft stock was by then selling for $22 a share, and its board rejected the new offer. PeopleSoft also passed a “poison pill” provision by promising customers cash refunds of up to five times what they paid for their software if PeopleSoft were taken over by another company.

On February 26, 2004, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) sued to block Oracle’s bid, claiming the takeover would reduce the market’s competitors from three to two and “such a reduction in competition is likely to result in higher prices, less innovation, and decreased support” for large business custom- ers. Oracle challenged the government’s definition of the “enter- prise software market” as too narrow and asserted that if the market was defined as the market for all “business software,” then there were many dozens of companies competing in the market and not just three. Moreover, Oracle claimed, large companies such as Microsoft planned to enter the enterprise software market, and, anyway, large customers could negotiate low prices even when there were only two competing sellers in a market. On September 9, 2004, the court ruled in Oracle’s favor against the DOJ, and Oracle shortly acquired PeopleSoft.

Does an Oracle takeover of Peoplesoft leave the market too concentrated?

Do large companies do more good than bad?

Reference no: EM132193548

Questions Cloud

What percentage of parts will not meet weight specs : What percentage of parts will not meet the weight specs?

Write an assembly language program that prints your name : Write an assembly language program that prints your first name on the screen. Use the .ASCII pseudo-op to store the characters at the bottom of your program.

Write an assembly language version of the c library function : Write an assembly language version of the C library function strncpy(). As specified in the C library, the strncpy function should be a C callable function.

Does the summary meet the assignment criteria : Does this summary meet the assignment criteria? Does your summary present the main ideas in the original article?

Peoplesoft leave the market too concentrated : Does an Oracle takeover of Peoplesoft leave the market too concentrated? Do large companies do more good than bad?

Write an assembly procedure reads a string of word size : Write an assembly procedure reads a string of word size signed integers that ends with a "*" Count the number of negative integers.

Walmart employees to reduce income equality : Identify three specific changes you would make for Walmart employees to reduce income equality.

An assembly language program to input a string : Write an assembly language program to input a string from the user, count and display the number of times each word occur in the user input string.

Charge potential frequent abusers higher fee structure : Would it be ethical to charge potential “frequent abusers” a higher fee structure?

User Account

All Pages