Reference no: EM132247224
Gratz vs. Bollinger
1. Parties and Courts
Who is involved?
This case was held with Jennifer Gratz and Patrick Hamacher vs The University of Michigan
Who are the parties?
Which court or courts was the case heard in?
Do not include any lawyers or any judges.
2. Relevant facts
What are the facts of the case?
What happened to lead up to the case being heard in court?
Explain the story, but keep it brief.
3. The legal issue(s) raised
What important issue(s) does the case touch on?
This is not a restatement of the facts. It could be a matter of an individual’s rights, or about government rights or limits. Often it can be stated in a question like: “Is it OK for such-and-such a thing to happen?”
4. Holding of the Court
What is the holding of the court? How did the court decide?
In the situation of multiple courts, what was the decision of each of the various courts involved?
Did the case settle out of court?
5. Reasoning of the Court
What was the reasoning of the court?
Besides just identifying what the court decided, what was the reasoning behind the decision?
Why did they decide the way they did?
6. Your thoughts
Was the case properly decided? What did the court get right or wrong?
What do you think the implications of the case are? What do you think about the case?
Did the court make the right decision?
What was or will be the long term impact of the decision?
Consider the following questions: How should the law define discrimination?
Is it possible to have an action that is discriminatory against one group but is not discriminatory against another group?