Other technical matters (about 25% of total mark for the assignment) Assignment must be in Font 12, 1.5 Spacing, and Times New Roman English expression: Spelling, syntax and grammar completely correct. Spelling, syntax and grammar generally correct although there were two or three minor errors. Spelling, syntax and grammar generally correct although there were more than three minor errors. Spelling, syntax and grammar acceptable but there were frequent minor or serious errors. Unacceptably high number of minor and/or numerous serious errors in spelling, syntax and/or grammar. In-text referencing: Harvard or APA referencing system used with 100% accuracy. Harvard or APA referencing system used with high level of accuracy. Harvard or APA referencing used correctly although with some errors. Harvard or APA referencing used correctly although with some significant errors. No referencing or many serious errors in using Harvard or APA referencing. Reference list: Reference list comprehensive and had no errors. Reference list comprehensive with no omissions but some minor errors.

Grasp of core unit theory: The Annotated bibliography demonstrated deep, accurate understanding of unit principles and concepts at a very high level of sophistication. Demonstrated deep, accurate understanding of unit principles and concepts. Demonstrated accurate understanding of unit principles and concepts, although a little superficial or flawed in places. Sound grasp of unit principles and concepts, perhaps one-dimensional and superficial in places and perhaps some misconceptions. One or more important unit concepts or principles seriously misunderstood, or no relevant theoretical framework established. Academic Journals: Annotated bibliography was supported with appropriate peered reviewed academic journals (7 minimum) and other quality sources Annotated bibliography was supported with appropriate peered reviewed academic journals (6 minimum) and other quality sources Annotated bibliography was supported with appropriate peered reviewed academic journals (5 minimum) and other quality sources Annotated bibliography was supported with appropriate peered reviewed academic journals (4 minimum)

Response to assigned topic: The Annotated bibliography responded directly to the topic and to every separate part of the topic in an exceptionally balanced manner with no irrelevant material. The Annotated bibliography responded directly to the topic and to every separate part of the topic in a balanced manner with minimal irrelevant material. The Annotated bibliography responded directly to the topic and to every separate part of the topic in a reasonably balanced manner, perhaps with a small amount of irrelevant material and some issues not properly developed. Overall the Annotated bibliography responded directly to the topic but with some digressions and irrelevancies. Some aspects of the topic were not developed properly and some less important aspects may have been overlooked. Taken as a whole, the assignment did not respond adequately to the topic. Important aspects were overlooked and/or much of the material was irrelevant.

Excellent 85%?100% Very Good 75%?84% Good 65%?74% Satisfactory 50%?64% Unacceptable 0%?49% WARNING! If assignment 1 Part A was not submitted there is an automatic 20% of final marks will be deducted. WARNING! failure to meet the minimum academic references will automatically result in a maximum mark of 40% for the complete assignment Response to assigned topic, the understanding of relevant literature, theory, and literature review Structure:: (about 75% of total mark for the assignment) Structure: The Annotated bibliography was very comprehensive and had excellent structure with no errors. The Annotated bibliography was comprehensive and had very good structure with some errors The Annotated bibliography had good structure and appropriate content but with some errors. The Annotated bibliography consisted of suitable information, had generally suitable structure although some aspects could have been improved The Annotated bibliography did not have suitable structure and information