NRP 472 Nursing Research and Evidence Based Practice

Reference no: EM132446240

NRP 472 - Nursing Research and Evidence Based Practice - Northern Kentucky University

Writing Assignment: Critique of Quantitative Research Article

Article - Randomized controlled trial of a nursing intervention to reduce emergency department revisits by Sylvie Cossette, Alain Vadeboncoeur, Nancy Frasure-Smith, Jane McCusker, Danielle Perreault, Marie-Claude Guertin

Guidelines for Critiquing Research Design in a Quantitative Study

Question 1. Was the design experimental. quasi-experimental, or nonexperimental? What specific design was used? Was this a cause-probing study? Given the type of question (Therapy, Prognosis, etc.), was the most rigorous possible design used?

Question 2. What type of comparison was called for in the research design? Was the comparison strategy effective in illuminating key relationships?

Question 3. If the study involved an intervention, were the intervention and control conditions adequately described? Was blinding used, and if so, who was blinded? If not, is there a good rationale for failure to use blinding?

Question 4. If the study was nonexperimental, why did the researcher opt not to intervene? If the study was cause-probing, which criteria for inferring causality were potentially compromised? Was a retrospective or prospective design used, and was such a design appropriate?

Question 5. Was the study longitudinal or cross-sectional? Was the number and timing of data collection points appropriate?

Question 6. What did the researcher do to control confounding participant characteristics, and were the procedures effective? What are the threats to the study's internal validity? Did the design enable the researcher to draw causal inferences about the relationship between the independent variable and the outcome?

Question 7. what are the major limitations of the design used? Were these limitations acknowledged by the researcher and taken into account in interpreting results? What can be said about the study's external validity?

Your paper should be written in APA style, using headings for each Section.

Reference no: EM132446240

Questions Cloud

Identify the four steps of integrative negotiation process : Identify the four steps of Integrative Negotiation Process, and conduct analysis of how these four steps might help you in designing your negotiation strategy.

Complete the university of phoenix material : Complete the University of Phoenix Material: Risk Identification Scenarios worksheet (all three scenarios). Include a detailed identification and justification

Create a retention plan for a top performer : Create a retention plan for a top performer. What are the components needed to do so? How do you retain a top employee that is unhappy with the organization?

Explain the relationship in terms of cause and effect : Explain how a personal problem can be caused by a larger social issue. It can be a problem that you, a friend or family member, or someone

NRP 472 Nursing Research and Evidence Based Practice : NRP 472 Nursing Research and Evidence Based Practice Assignment Help and Solution, Northern Kentucky University - Homework Help - Quantitative Research Article

Value-of-service pricing for hardee customers : What would be the advantages/disadvantages of using cost-of-service versus value-of-service pricing for Hardee's customers?

What value or benefit do they provide your research proposal : Post properly formatted APA references for two journal article sources that you will use in your literature review next week. Include a quick mention.

Are the effects of social networking sites positive : Are the effects of social networking sites positive or negative?Should parents give their teenagers an allowance?Can music help us emotionally?

Performance measurement control system : How does the project closure review differ from a performance measurement control system?

User Account

All Pages