Reference no: EM133255763

Questions

1. The dispute between the two competing hypotheses of nature versus nurture is essential for the neuroscience perspective of psychology since it explains how the brain and nervous system develop and affect behavior. The hypothesized behaviors (such as intelligence, memory, and impulsivity, among others) can be influenced by both nature (such as genes and the prenatal environment, among other things) and nurture (such as experience and learning, among other things). Still, it is not yet known to what extent each factor contributes.

2. The nature versus nurture debate is significant for the evolutionary perspective of psychology because it can help to explain why certain behaviors (such as mate selection, aggression, and so on) are adaptive and have been passed down through the generations. 3. The nature versus nurture debate is significant for the developmental perspective of psychology because it can help to explain why certain behaviors (such as mate selection, aggression, and so on) have been passed down through the generations. Again, both nature and nurture have the potential to play a role in these behaviors, but it is difficult to determine the relative importance of each factor.

3. The argument of whether their genes or environment more influences a person's behavior is significant for the behavior genetics perspective of psychology because it explains the function that genes and environments play in shaping behavior. Behavior geneticists employ studies on twins and adoption to separate the influences of nature and nurture. However, how much each factor contributes to an individual's characteristics is still unknown.

4. The dispute over whether or not early life experiences have a more significant influence on adult conduct is essential for the psychodynamic perspective of psychology since it helps to understand how early childhood events can shape adult behavior. It is still unknown to what extent nature (such as genes, prenatal environment, etc.) contributes to forming behavior, even though the psychodynamic approach emphasizes the role that nurture (such as experience, learning, etc.) plays in shaping behavior.

5. The dispute over whether a person's genetics or environment influences conduct is essential to the behavioral perspective of psychology because it helps to understand how the environment might affect behavior. It is still unknown to what extent nature (such as genes, prenatal environment, etc.) contributes to molding behavior, even though the behavioral approach emphasizes the role that nurture (such as experience, learning, etc.) plays in shaping behavior.

6. The debate over whether a person's mind is shaped more by their environment or genetics is essential for the cognitive perspective of psychology since it explains how the mind develops and affects behavior. The cognitive view strongly emphasizes the role that nature (such as genes and the prenatal environment, among other things) plays in determining behavior. Still, it is unknown to what extent nurture (such as experience and learning, among other things) also plays a role.

7. The dispute over whether conduct is more influenced by natural predispositions or by the social and cultural environment is significant for the social-cultural perspective of psychology since it explains how such factors can have an effect. It is still unknown to what extent nature (such as genes, prenatal environment, etc.) contributes to molding behavior, even though the social-cultural approach emphasizes the role of nurture (such as experience, learning, etc.) in shaping behavior.