Reference no: EM133232566

I'm dealing with the Natural Law and Moral decision making. I need help with writing my moral reasoning short paper. I'm using the Grisez reading and the cheating dilemma with the other readings trying to compare utilitarian reasoning with natural law-based moral reasoning. Would utilitarian reasoning provide a different recommendation then the one Grisez gives? I am to explain this in a short paper that contains the following elements:

I need a clear thesis and unifying message. It needs to be well organized with smooth transitions point to point. No slang or informal language or contractions. I can not use personal pronouns I, we, you for example. I also need to make use of the readings and the terms natural law and or moral law to help shed light on the main points of said paper. Properly cited from course text, Scripture references, or outside sources and a polished writing style must be demonstrated.