Reference no: EM131119607

Question

Match the appropriate case to its description.

Cooper v. Morin (1980)
Ponte v. Real (1985)
Monroe v. Pape (1961)
Howes v. Fields (2012)
Wilkinson v. Austin (2005)
Florence v. Burlington County (2012)
Cruz v. Beto (1972)
Estelle v. Gamble (1976)
Procunierv. Martinez (1974)
Hudson v. Palmer (1984)

a. Arrestees may be strip searched for minor offenses to ensure safety and security of the facility.

b. Neither inconvenience nor cost is an acceptable excuse for treating female inmates differently than male inmates.

c. Upheld an Ohio policy allowing most dangerous offenders to be held in "supermax" cells, following several levels of review prior to transfer.

d. Prisoners have no reasonable expectation of privacy in their cell that entitles them to protections against "unreasonable searches."

e. Inmates have to be given a "reasonable opportunity" to pursue their religious faiths.

f. Individuals deprived of their rights by state officers acting under the color of state law have the right to bring action in federal court.

g. Inmates who are facing questioning by law enforcement officers while incarcerated need not be advised of their Miranda Rights.

h. Prison officials have a duty to provide proper inmate medical care.

i. Inmates have certain rights in the disciplinary process.

j. Censorship of inmate mail is acceptable only when necessary to protect legitimate government interests