Criteria High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Unsatisfactory Final Presentation (10%) Professional presentation, with good mix of text and images/graphics or animations. Easy to read and understand. High degree of verbal communication skills. Excellent time management. Demonstrated respect towards group members, audience and markers. Very good presentation demonstrating excellent preparation and confidence in overall performance. Good time management . Demonstrated respect towards group members, audience and markers. Acceptable presentation demonstrating preparation and confidence in overall performance. Acceptable time management. Demonstrated respect towards group members, audience and markers. Acceptable presentation demonstrating preparation but lack of confidence or exhibiting nervousness in overall performance. Acceptable time management. Demonstrated respect towards group members, audience and markers. Poorperformance, lack of preparation, poor verbal and communication. No slides prepared or did not present. Poor time management. Lack of respect and/or markers.

Presentation and referencing (25%) Professional presentation of report; clear and logical structure; concise and informative executive summary; good use of tables and figures; correct referencing; free from errors. Professional presentation of report; clear and logical structure; concise and informative executive summary; good use of tables and figures; correct referencing; free from errors. Good presentation of report with all required contents; good executive summary; acknowledgement of sources; some minor mistakes. Good presentation of report with all required contents; basic executive summary; acknowledgement of sources; some major mistakes. Incomplete report; poor presentation; incorrect referencing; lots of errors and mistakes.

Delivery/contract (15%) Professional submission; most appropriate project delivery method which clearly outlines the advantages, disadvantages and clear reasoning for the desired Most appropriate project delivery method which outlines the advantages, disadvantages and reasoning for the desired pro- forma contract. Appropriate project delivery method which outlines the advantages, disadvantages and reasoning for the desired pro- forma contract. A project delivery method which outlines some advantages and disadvantages or reasoning for the desired pro-forma contract. Unsuitable project delivery method which does not outline or state clear reasoning or incomplete or lack contract or details.

Criteria High Distinction 85-100 points Distinction 75-84 points Credit 65-74 points Pass 50-64 points Unsatisfactory >50 points Construction Information (15%) Professional submission; Complete rethink of proposal; Fully inclusive with additional cutting edge or state of the art technology introduced; Advanced research concepts and application. Easy to read; New concepts introduced; All items included with additional information provided; Clear evidence of research. Easy to read; Some interesting concepts proposed; All items included; Basic evidence of research. Legible; Basic provision of information; Most items included; Little evidence of research. Very poor expression; Insufficient or incorrect information; Parts missing; No evidence of research.

Presentation & Referencing (25%) Professional presentation of report; clear and logical structure; concise and informative executive summary; good use of tables and figures; correct referencing; free from errors. Professional presentation of report; clear and logical structure; concise and informative executive summary; good use of tables and figures; correct referencing; one or two errors. Good presentation of report with all required contents; good executive summary; acknowledgement of sources; some minor mistakes. Good presentation of report with all required contents; good executive summary; acknowledgement of sources; some minor to major mistakes. Incomplete report; poor presentation; incorrect referencing; lots of errors and mistakes.

Task 5 (15%) Proposed block model A well thought out and detailed explanation with appropriate use of proposed materials and construction method. Four or more photos. A well though out and detailed explanation with appropriate use of materials and construction method. Three or more photos. A detailed explanation with appropriate use of materials and construction method. Two or more photos. A brief explanation of materials and construction method. Only one photo or unclear image. No explanation or detail, lack of materials and construction method. No photos attached or unclear image.

Task 4 (15%) Draft Specification A well detailed and professionally produced specification for the two building systems and one fit-out trade with references. A detailed and professionally produced specification for the two building systems and one fit-out trade with references. A detailed specification for the two building systems and one fit-out trade with references. A specification for the two building systems and one fit-out trade with references. Unsuitable specification or lack of detail in specification, not related to proposed project or incomplete specification.

Task 3 (15%) Recommended project delivery method Most appropriate project delivery method which clearly outlines advantages, disadvantages and clear reasoning for the desired pro-forma contract. Most appropriate project delivery method which outlines advantages, disadvantages and reasoning for the desired pro- forma contract. Appropriate project delivery method which outlines the advantages, disadvantages and reasoning for the desired pro- forma contract. Acceptable pr oj ec t delivery method which outlines the advantages and disadvantages or reasoning for the desired pro-forma contract. Unsuitable project delivery method does not outline or state clear reasoning or incomplete contract.

Task 2 (15%) Preliminary time schedule Professionally presented (MS Project or similar) Gantt chart, easy to read and understand w i t h clear logic and explanation of tasks. Well presented (MS Project or similar) Gantt chart with logical explanation of tasks. Well presented (MS Word/Excel or similar) Gantt chart with some logical explanation of tasks. Acceptably presented (MS Word/Excel or similar) time schedule with some explanation of tasks. Poorly presented or incomplete time schedule, lots of errors and mistakes or no time schedule submitted.

Criteria High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Unsatisfactory Task 1 (15%) Preliminary budget cost Professionally presented preliminary b u d g e t with references based on current and commercially available cost data. Well- presented preliminary budget with references based on current and commercially available cost data. Well- presented preliminary budget with most references based on current and commercially available cost data. Acceptable preliminary budget with some references based on current and commercially available cost data. Poorly presented or incomplete budget. Not based on current costs or referenced or lack of preliminary budget.

Groups who submit late assessments without approval for an extension will be penalised 10% per calendar day up to 10 days. Extensions will only be considered under Special Considerations such as severe and/or grave illness, misadventure, accident, or extenuating circumstances beyond your control. Assessments that do not adhere to the word limit (+/-10%) may be returned for resubmission.

Only one student per group (ideally group leader/manager) is required to submit the reports through the vUWS submission links. Groups should aim to submit early and view the originality. This will allow you to identify any parts of your assessment you have accidentally plagiarised. Students are encouraged to edit and resubmit before the due date!