Lets take a look at how we might model the eect of

Reference no: EM13375990

Let's take a look at how we might model the eect of increased income (or wealth) on people's preferences for dierent kinds of goods. We'll start with a consumer named Florence, and we'll investigate her preferences for food versus all other goods, and her preferences for vacation travel versus all other goods. In other words, we are going to separately look at how Florence feels about trade-os between food and money, and how she feels about trade-os between travel and money, but not directly at how she feels about trade-os between food and travel. This is obviously somewhat unrealistic, because most people probably take their food expenditures into account when deciding how much travel they can aord, but this is the kind of simpli cation that economic analysts make all the time, and in many cases it is \good enough".

(a) Suppose Florence has Cobb-Douglas preferences over travel, T, measured in weekend trips, and all other goods, Y , measured in thousands of dollars, represented by the utility function U(T, Y ) = T^1/5 Y^4/5.

(i) Compute Florence's MRS of all other goods for travel. (In other words, compute her MRS with travel on the horizontal axis.

(ii) Let's look at a single year in Florence's life. Suppose that her current plan is to consume ve weekend trips and fty thousand dollars worth of other goods this year. What is her willingness to pay for additional units of travel?

(iii) Now, suppose we gave Florence $20,000 worth of non-travel goods, so that her new consumption bundle is ve weekend trips and seventy thousand dollars worth of other goods. This is eectively the same thing as increasing her income. What is her willingness to pay for additional units of travel now? Compare it to her original willingness to pay. Has it gone up, gone down, or stayed the same?

(iv) Does the eect of increased income on Florence's willingness to pay for travel seem realistic? Comment on the appropriateness of using a Cobb-Douglas utility function to analyze her travel decisions.

(b) Next, suppose Florence has quasilinear preferences over food, F, measured in pounds of food2, and all other goods, Y , measured in thousands of dollars, represented by the utility function U(F, Y ) = ln F + Y . [To remind yourself what you know about quasilinear preferences, review section 4.3 of Varian.]

(i) Compute Florence's MRS of money for food. (In other words, compute her MRS with food on the horizontal axis.)

(ii) Once again, let's look at a single year in Florence's life. Suppose that she is currently planning to consume two thousand pounds of food and fty thousand dollars worth of other goods. What is her willingness to pay for additional units of food?

(iii) Once again, suppose we gave Florence $20,000 worth of non-food goods, so that her new consumption bundle is two thousand pounds of food and seventy thousand dollars worth of other goods. Again, we have eectively increased her income. What is her willingness to pay for additional units of food now? Compare it to her original willingness to pay. Has it gone up, gone down, or stayed the same?

(iv) Does the eect of increased income on Florence's willingness to pay for food seem realistic? Comment on the appropriateness of using a quasilinear utility function to analyze her food decisions.

(i) Graph two or more of Florence's indierence curves for travel and money. Draw a dashed vertical line at ve weekend trips. Graphically show her MRS at ve weekend trips on the two indierence curves. What has happened to her MRS as she has gotten richer? [Your graph should be neat and clear, but does not need to be precise. There's a handy graph of Cobb-Douglas indierence curves on page 64 of Varian.]

(ii) Graph two or more of Florence's indierence curves for food and money. Draw a dashed vertical line at two thousand pounds of food. Graphically show her MRS at two thousand pounds of food on the two indierence curves. What has happened to her MRS as she has gotten richer?

(iii) If you were a consultant, and a client asked you to analyze consumer decisions about dierent kinds of goods, for what kinds of goods might you choose to use a Cobb-Douglas model of preferences, and for what other kinds of goods might you choose to use a quasilinear model of preferences?

Reference no: EM13375990

Questions Cloud

In this program you will implement a simple reverse polish : in this program you will implement a simple reverse polish notation rpn calculator. rpn is a notation in which

Java program the program has a page that shows the users : java program the program has a page that shows the users name and program name. a second jpanel that shows 4 buttons

One way of purifying gaseous h2 is to pass it under high : one way of purifying gaseous h2 is to pass it under high pressure through the holes of a metals crystal structure.

1nbsp below are six statementsnbsp indicate whether each : 1nbsp below are six statements.nbsp indicate whether each one pertains to microeconomics mic or macroeconomics

Lets take a look at how we might model the eect of : lets take a look at how we might model the eect of increased income or wealth on peoples preferences for dierent kinds

Bob and bette rhymes with jetty each have cobb-douglas : bob and bette rhymes with jetty each have cobb-douglas preferences for cheese c and peanut butter p each of which will

Honda uses flexible plans in the manufacturing of its cars : honda uses flexible plans in the manufacturing of its cars. discuss whether this method of production results in

Question 1 a suppose the income elasticity of demand for : question 1 a suppose the income elasticity of demand for furniture is 3 and the income elasticity for doctors services

The products profits per unit output are 50 per gallon for : the products profits per unit output are .50 per gallon for gasoline and .75 per square foot for fiber.nbsp then the

User Account

All Pages