Structure of the report (15% of total mark) ? Sequence and structure are logical and easy to follow; excellent overall organisation. Powerful connections between different themes or sections; clear and concise focus throughout. (12-15 marks) ? Sequence and structure are logical and easy to follow; good overall organisation. (10-11 marks) ? Structured well enough to make sense; could be better organised and more tightly focused upon the main points. (9 marks) ? Mostly coherent organisation; may have some sections where difficult to follow reasoning. Could be more clearly and logically organised. (8 marks) ? Lacks coherent organisation and structure. Difficult to follow reasoning. Describes disconnected bits of information. (<8 marks)

Application of theories & concepts (25% of total mark) ? Outstanding application of relevant theories & concepts in analysing the chosen leader and comparing their leadership style, demonstrating a deep and broad understanding of the subject matter. (21-25 marks) ? Very good application of relevant theories & concepts in analysing the chosen leader, and comparing their leadership style, demonstrating (17-20 marks) ? Good application of relevant theories & concepts in analysing the chosen leader and comparing their leadership style. (15-16 marks) ? Adequate application of relevant theories & concepts in analysing the chosen leader. (13-14 marks) ? Little or no attempt at applying relevant theories and concepts. (<13 marks)

Use of information (25% of total mark) ? Evidence of a high level of independent research (using information beyond that provided in the subject); Appropriate use of relevant academic and/or professional body publications, with all references correctly cited. (21-25 marks) ? Evidence of independent research (using information beyond that provided in the subject); Appropriate use of mostly-relevant academic and/or professional body publications, with all references correctly cited. (17-20 marks) ? Little evidence of independent research (using information beyond that provided in the subject); Mostly-appropriate use of academic and/or professional body publications, with most references correctly cited. (15-16 marks) ? Little evidence of independent research (using information beyond that provided in the subject); Acceptable use of academic and/or professional body publications. (13-14 marks) ? No evidence of any independent research; Little or no use of academic and/or professional body publications. (<13 marks)

CRITERIA A: Excellent (> 80 %) B: Very good (70 – 79%) C: Good (60 – 69%) D: Acceptable (50 – 59%) N: Unacceptable (<50%) Analysis of chosen leader (25% of total mark) ? Articulate and in-depth analysis of the chosen leader, addressing the questions posed with insight and evidence of engaging with the relevant literature. (21-25 marks) ? Articulate analysis of the chosen leader, addressing the questions posed, with evidence of engaging with the relevant literature. (17-20 marks) ? Good analysis of the chosen leader, addressing the questions posed. (15-16 marks) ? Adequate analysis of the chosen leader, attempting some of the questions posed. (13-14 marks) ? Poor analysis of the chosen leader, failing to address the key questions. (<13 marks)

What style of leadership did this leader deploy? Approximately 200 words What was the effectiveness (or otherwise) of the leadership behaviours displayed? You may cover Q 4 while answering this question. Approximately 450 words What impact did these leadership behaviours have on the project across its lifecycle? You may cover Q 4 while answering this question. Approximately 450 words Conclusion Approximately 150 words Be sure to link your observations or deductions to the key concepts covered in this subject in terms of general leadership theory and practice, within the specific context of project management.

4. An optional template for Assessment 4 Headings in the report Description and details Executive Summary Approximately 150 words Biography of the chosen person Approximately 100 words • Introduce Him/her • Education and credentials (if applicable) • Introduce the most highlighted companies that s/he has been working (or worked) in. • Notable achievements Please be careful about disclosure of personal information which is unethical.