Checklist that mandatory for completing Assessment 2 1. One example each from the above six criteria 2. More critical analysis than description 3. Identifying your strength as a leader along with your weaknesses. 4. Use of first person I…. 5. Improvement strategies that you would practice to be a good and effective leader. 6. Correct Harvard Referencing style 7. Last but not the least please address the criteria in the rubric too. We will be marking against the criteria in the rubric.

Please use the following checklist to submit your assessment 2 (Reflective Journal). We assume you all must be maintaining a weekly dairy to document your learning experiences in this subject and in general. This will assist you in completing this assessment task.

Areas for improvement (5 marks) The areas for improvement are either missing or unrelated to the key question, and neither are they supported by research. The areas for improvement and supporting research are presented, but they are not convincing or well connected. Whilst improvement is needed, there is a solid attempt at linking the areas for improvement with the relevant theories. The areas for improvement and evidence are of a high standard but would be more convincing if worded more clearly. There is no doubt, by the way the areas for improvement and evidence are presented, that these will be resolved.

Psychometric tests (5 marks) The student has not completed any psychometric tests or has not discussed them with enough substance. The student has undertaken the tests but hasn’t conducted the critical self-analysis required of a postgraduate subject. The student’s tests are interesting and the self-analysis is present but it is not clear the results have resulted in personal change. The student’s tests are analysed thoroughly and personal change is obvious. Problems with language prohibit further marks. The student hasn’t just described the results of the test thoroughly but also clearly embraced the results and made personal changes.

Assessment feedback (5 marks) The student has not referred to the first assessment or has not demonstrated how this latest submission has improved as a result. The student has briefly referred to the feedback but does not appear to have incorporated it in this latest submission. The student has covered the feedback and has made a good attempt to improve on it in this latest submission, but more detail is needed. The student has clearly taken on board the feedback and has since made obvious changes to this second assessment. The specific feedback the student received in the first assessment is entirely unneeded in this latest submission. A sterling effort.

In-class activities (5 marks) The student rarely attended class and the activities outlined here are therefore different to what transpired in the classroom. The student didn’t attend all classes and was mostly passive, hence why this section seems vague and only slightly sufficient. The student has made a good effort to link the activities with learning, but obvious gaps exist in terms of language and coherence. The student clearly derived value from the activities and has linked them strongly to self-analysis. Minor improvements needed. The student was not just present in class but also a valuable contributor, and this is obvious in the detailed and intelligent analysis.

Industry guest (5 marks) The student did not attend the industry guest session or does not demonstrate an understanding of the messages conveyed. The student’s interaction with the industry guest was passive and the learning derived from the session superficial. The student enjoyed the session with the industry guest but critical self- analysis is lacking and the writing style in parts is difficult to follow. The industry guest clearly had an impact on the student, as evidenced by a high level of self-reflection and critical thinking. The student evidently engaged with the industry guest, not just via this reflective journal but in the classroom, too.

Online resources (5 marks) The online resources are not included or are discussed without an obvious application to the student’s own leadership style. The online resources are discussed superficially without the critical analysis required of a postgraduate student. The online resources are discussed well, but greater self-analysis is required. Language, too, needs more coherence. The online resources are masterfully and analytically analysed but minor issues, such as language, preclude a higher mark. The online resources are discussed in expert language and self- analysis. The student has clearly engaged with the material.

This subject of mine was online so I was not attending the class so you don't mention about class activities. Apart from this you have to take more than 2 psycometric test on google by simply typing in google psychometric test on leadership and interpersonal traits and find out where you are lagging and where not. Remember you have to mention both positive and negative aspects. You do this psychometric test according to your skills and talent and I will alter it later if needed when i receive the assignement back. I am also attaching the industry guests lecture presenation ppt in the email so you can go through that as well for preparing the assignment. You have to mention 10 to 15 genuine references In text and End of Text with Harvard Referencing style. Remember please use simple English no complexity. The marking rubric is also attached with assessment outline and marking is done looking at the rubric. So you have to prepare the assessment accoring to the marking rubric. Please make sure assinment is prepared in accordance with the marking rubric as I don't want to fail the subject.

Hi there, I have mentioned the subject as Operations Management but The subject name is " People Culture and Contemporary Leadership". This is a "Reflective Journal" not academic journal. I have attached 3 files the 1. Assessment Outline 2. Assessment sample 3. Guidlines to assessment There are some other attachements of lecture slides which I am going to send via email so please refer that as well. As you can see in the assessment there is a Reflective journal to be prepared for the subject understnading where you have to mention the understanding of the subject.