Reference no: EM132432352
LAWS20058 - Australian Commercial Law Assignment, Central Queensland University, Australia
It is essential that you refer to relevant cases and statute sections to support the analysis. The answers should use the IRAC method as a structure- Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion and remedies. See Moodle resources to assist.
The IRAC method- Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion and remedies- requires you to set out clearly and in an organised way these matters:
- Identify the common law legal issues in dispute. What are the broad areas of contract law that are relevant here?
- Explain the principles of law, the rules, that apply and which are relevant to deciding the issue.
- Apply the relevant law to the facts. You may need to consider more than one approach here. There is not always one clear way.
- Conclusion and remedies- after the above stages reach a conclusion on the facts of the problem. Be sure to consider possible remedies for the innocent party.
PART A -
1. (Maximum 600 words) How would a court determine whether there was an enforceable agreement between Wing and Tom? You should support your analysis with case references. Do not discuss statute.
2. (Maximum 250 words) What possible remedies could be granted if Wing was successful in legal action for breach of contract against Tom? You should support your analysis with case references. Only discuss common law and equity where relevant in the answer. Do not discuss statute.
PART B -
What action could Wing take against Lies IT Pty. Ltd under the Australian Consumer Law legislation? Include the issues of remedies and consumer guarantees in the analysis.
PART C (600 words) -
Explain whether Wing could take legal action in negligence against Betty for her advice about the business purchase based on common law and state legislation legal principles.
Attachment:- Australian Commercial Law Assignment File.rar