Reference no: EM133812777
Questions
1. Which U.S. Supreme Court case held that police must inform suspects of their rights prior to custodial interrogation?
U.S. v. Miller
Texas v. Cobb
Miranda v. Arizona
Mapp v. Ohio
2. In which of the following U.S. Supreme Court decisions was the exclusionary rule developed?
Miranda v. Arizona
Weeks v. U.S.
U.S. v. Miller
U.S. v. Salerno
3. Which of the following U.S. Supreme Court cases extended the exclusionary rule to the states?
Mapp v. Ohio
Terry v. Ohio
Marbury v. Madison
Burns v. Reed
4. Which Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides for protection against self-incrimination?
1st Amendment
4th Amendment
5th Amendment
6th Amendment
5. Which of the following is not part of the Miranda warnings?
right to a speedy and public trial
right to remain silent
right to an attorney
right to a court appointed attorney if necessary
6. Which court decision held that once a suspect has invoked his right to an attorney, police may not continue interrogation without his/her attorney present?
Minnick v. Mississippi
Miranda v. Arizona
Mapp v. Ohio
Burns v. Reed
7. Which of the following was not one of the points made by the U.S. Supreme Court in its landmark ruling, Miranda v. Arizona?
The "police dominated" atmosphere of an interrogation room calls for some type of protection for the defendant.
The defendant's Fifth Amendment privilege against self incrimination is applicable to the police interrogation as well as questioning by the prosecutor during trial.
The Constitution affords a defendant certain guarantees, including the right to remain silent and the right to consult counsel.
The interrogation at issue was manipulative and harsh and the police, therefore, overstepped their bounds in obtaining Mr. Miranda's confession.
8. What legal doctrine was established to control police misconduct?
exclusionary rule
rules related to exculpatory evidence
writ of habeous corpus
stare decisis
9. The exclusionary rule applies to
coerced confessions.
unnecessarily suggestive police lineups.
seizures of items during an unconstitutional search.
The exclusionary rule applies to all of these.
10. What rule prohibits the prosecutor from using illegally obtained evidence during a trial?
the exclusionary rule.
the discovery rule.
the alibi rule.
the suppression rule.
11. The Miranda warnings do not have to be given before law enforcement obtains
breath or blood samples.
handwriting samples.
fingerprints.
Miranda warnings are not required for any of these.
12. Which Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures?
1st Amendment
4th Amendment
5th Amendment
6th Amendment
13. Searches fall into two broad categories:
warrant and probable cause.
warrantless and reasonable suspicion.
warrant and warrantless.
bench warrant and affidavit.
14. Which of the following cases deals with "stop and frisk"?
Mapp v. Ohio
Terry v. Ohio
Wolf v. Colorado
Miranda v. Arizona
15. Which of the following is not a type of warrantless search?
search with consent
search incident to lawful arrest
hidden view
plain view
16. Which of the following is the primary requirement for a search warrant?
probable cause
good faith
reasonable suspicion
preponderance of the evidence
17. Searches in which types of cases are most likely to involve questions of police conduct?
Burglaries
Fraud
DWI cases
Weapons and drug cases
18. The Constitutional protection against warrantless search and seizure applies to which of the following?
use of thermal imaging device to scan a building to detect the presence of lamps used to grow marijuana
search and seizure of garbage left for collection outside a home since it is abandoned property
aerial surveillance of a suspect's property from an aircraft in public space
searches conducted at U.S. borders or international airports