Reference no: EM1380959 , Length: 393 Words

Q. State police officers, armed through a valid warrant to arrest Peter Swope for the crime of defrauding the state welfare agency of $100,000, stopped Swope in his car on the Turnpike. He was taken into custody; also his auto was locked also left on the shoulder of the road. Later which day the state troopers returned also searched Swope's car. They located a plastic bag on the passenger seat, which they brought back to the station also opened to find out a large quantity of illegal explosives. Although the welfare fraud charges have been dropped, the prosecution intends to use the explosives in an upcoming trial for possession of illegal explosives. Swope's counsel has filed a motion to suppress also has persuaded the court which because there was no probable cause to believe sizable items were present in the car, the search was unlawful. Is there any way the prosecution can nonetheless avoid suppression of the explosives? Illustrate what if state police regulations require which vehicles of persons taken into custody on the open road are impounded also subjected to a prescribed inventory inspection?