Reference no: EM131393518 , Length: 13

Read the article you are to critique once to get an overview.

Article - High performance HRM and establishment performance in Pakistan: an empirical analysis

The following are some questions you may want to address in your critique.

1. Is the title of the article appropriate and clear?

2. Is the abstract specific and representative of the article?

3. Is the purpose of the article made clear in the introduction?

4. Are the study design and methods appropriate for the purposes of the study?

5. Is all of the discussion relevant?

6. Should some sections of the manuscript be expanded, condensed or omitted? 7. Are the author's statements clear?

8. Has the author been objective in his or her discussion of the topic?

WRITING A LITERATURE REVIEW

A literature review is both a summary and explanation of the complete and current state of knowledge on a limited topic as found in academic books and journal articles. 

 Purpose of the Literature Review

• It gives readers easy access to research on a particular topic by selecting high quality articles or studies that are relevant, meaningful, important and valid and summarizing them into one complete report.
• It provides an excellent starting point for researchers beginning to do research in a new area by forcing them to summarize, evaluate, and compare original research in that specific area.
• It ensures that researchers do not duplicate work that has already been done.
• It can provide clues as to where future research is heading or recommend areas on which to focus.
• It highlights key findings.
• It identifies inconsistencies, gaps and contradictions in the literature.
• It provides a constructive analysis of the methodologies and approaches of other researchers.

Content of the Review

Introduction 

The introduction explains the focus and establishes the importance of the subject. It discusses what kind of work has been done on the topic and identifies any controversies within the field or any recent research which has raised questions about earlier assumptions. 

Body 

Often divided by headings/subheadings, the body summarizes and evaluates the current state of knowledge in the field. It notes major themes or topics, the most important trends, and any findings about which researchers agree or disagree. 

Conclusion 

The conclusion summarizes all the evidence presented and shows its significance. If the review is a stand-alone assignment for a course, it should suggest any practical applications of the research as well as the implications and possibilities for future research.

Nine Steps to Writing a Literature Review

1. Find a working topic.

Look at your specific area of study. Think about what interests you. Talk to your professor, brainstorm, and read lecture notes and recent issues of periodicals in the field.

2. Review the literature.

• Using keywords search a computer database. It is best to use at least two databases relevant to your discipline.
• Remember that the reference lists of recent articles and reviews can lead to valuable papers.
• Make certain that you also include any studies contrary to your point of view.

3. Focus your topic narrowly and select papers accordingly.

Consider the following: 

• What interests you?
• What interests others?
• What time span of research will you consider?

Choose an area of research that is due for a review.

4. Read the selected articles thoroughly and evaluate them.

• What assumptions do most/some researchers seem to be making?
• What methodologies do they use? - What testing procedures, subjects, material tested?
• Evaluate and synthesize the research findings and conclusions drawn.
• Note conflicting theories, results, and methodologies.
• Watch for popularity of theories and how this has/has not changed over time.

5. Organize the selected papers by looking for patterns and by developing sub- topics.

Note things such as: 

• Findings that are common/contested
• Two or three important trends in the research
• The most influential theories

6. Organize your own paper based on the findings from steps 4 & 5.

Develop headings/subheadings. 

7. Write the body of the paper

Follow the plan you have developed above, making certain that each section links logically to the one before and after, and that you have divided your sections by themes or subtopics, not by reporting the work of individual theorists or researchers.

8. Look at what you have written; focus on analysis, not description.

Look at the topic sentences of each paragraph. If you were to read only these sentences, would you find that your paper presented a clear position, logically developed, from beginning to end? If, for example, you find that each paragraph begins with a researcher's name, it might indicate that, instead of evaluating and comparing the research literature from an analytical point of view, you have simply described what research has been done. This is one of the most common problems with student literature reviews. So if your paper still does not appear to be defined by a central, guiding concept, or if it does not critically analyze the literature selected, then you should make a new outline based on what you have said in each section and paragraph of the paper, and decide whether you need to add information, to delete off-topic information, or to re-structure the paper entirely.

Finishing Touches: Revising and Editing Your Work

• Read your work out loud. That way you will be better able to identify where you need punctuation marks to signal pauses or divisions within sentences, where you have made grammatical errors, or where your sentences are unclear.
• Since the purpose of a literature review is to demonstrate that the writer is familiar with the important professional literature on the chosen subject, check to make certain that you have covered all of the important, up-to-date, and pertinent texts. In the sciences and some of the social sciences it is important that your literature be quite recent; this is not so important in the humanities.
• Make certain that all of the citations and references are correct and that you are referencing in the appropriate style for your discipline. If you are uncertain which style to use, ask your professor.
• Check to make sure that you have not plagiarized either by failing to cite a source of information, or by using words quoted directly from a source. (Usually if you take three or more words directly from another source, you should put those words within quotation marks, and cite the page.)
• There should be no grammatical or spelling errors.
• Sentences should flow smoothly and logically.

Attachment:- Article.rar