Reference no: EM131644078

Question: There are three factories on the Mo miss River. Each emits two types of pollutants, labeled P₁ and P_2, into the river. If the waste from each factory is processed, the pollution in the river can be reduced. It costs $1500 to process a ton of factory 1 waste, and each ton processed reduces the amount of P₁ by 0.10 ton and the amount of P₂ by 0.45 ton. It costs $1000 to process a ton of factory 2 waste, and each ton processed reduces the amount of P₁ by 0.20 ton and the amount of P₂ by 0.25 ton. It costs $2000 to process a ton of factory 3 waste, and each ton processed reduces the amount of P₁ by 0.40 ton and the amount of P₂ by 0.30 ton. The state wants to reduce the amount of P₁ in the river by at least 30 tons and the amount of P₂ by at least 40 tons.

a. Use Solver to determine how to minimize the cost of reducing pollution by the desired amounts. Are the LP assumptions (proportionality, additivity, divisibility) reasonable in this problem?

b. Use Solver Table to investigate the effects of increases in the minimal reductions required by the state. Specifically, see what happens to the amounts of waste processed at the three factories and the total cost if both requirements (currently 30 and 40 tons, respectively) are increased by the same percentage. Revise your model so that you can use Solver Table to investigate these changes when the percentage increase varies from 10% to 100% in increments of 10%. Do the amounts processed at the three factories and the total cost change in a linear manner?