I have paid for the assignment. Please read every detail and give answer according to the given case study. And please send me the solution with Turnitin report. I have to submit this assignment on Thursday at 5 pm. Can you please cited references in the text as well and please references should be in the IEEE style. Only 9-10 hours left to submit my assignment. Please try to provide me Solution before time. I need the solution with the Turnitin report and make sure that solution should be 0% plagiarism. Also, please inform to the expert that the references should be like this [1]. I have checked my assignment now. I am very much satisfied with the point digital divide because according to the requirements of the assignment there should be mentioned about digital divide in the Australia but you have mention about the digital divide in Australia, as well as you have mentioned about other countries too which is really highlighted of my solution.

Conclusions All elements are present and very well integrated. Components present with good cohesive Components present and mostly well integrated Most components present Proposal lacks structure. Demonstration Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments Consistency logical and convincing Mostly consistent logical and convincing Adequate cohesion and conviction Argument is confused and disjointed IEEE Reference style Clear styles with excellent source of references. Clear referencing style Generally good referencing style Sometimes clear referencing style Lacks consistency with many errors

Demonstration Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments Consistency logical and convincing Mostly consistent logical and convincing Adequate cohesion and conviction Argument is confused and disjointed IEEE Reference style Clear styles with excellent source of references. Clear referencing style Generally good referencing style Sometimes clear referencing style Lacks consistency with many errors

Outcomes All elements are present and very well integrated. Components present with good cohesive Components present and mostly well integrated Most components present Proposal lacks structure. Limitations All elements are present and very well integrated. Components present with good cohesive Components present and mostly well integrated Most components present Proposal lacks structure. Conclusions All elements are present and very well integrated. Components present with good cohesive Components present and mostly well integrated Most components present Proposal lacks structure.

Project hardware requirements Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but did not source reference material appropriately Demonstrate d ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately Demonstrated ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately Did not demonstrate ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately Network Design in Netsim Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments Consistency logical and convincing Mostly consistent logical and convincing Adequate cohesion and conviction Argument is confused and disjointed

Marking Rubrics Grades Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Project scope Concise and specific to the project Topics are relevant and soundly analysed. Generally relevant and analysed. Some relevance and briefly presented. This is not relevant to the assignment topic. Challenges Concise and specific to the project Topics are relevant and soundly analysed. Generally relevant and analysed. Some relevance and briefly presented. This is not relevant to the assignment topic. User-centric design concept Concise and specific to the project Topics are relevant and soundly analysed. Generally relevant and analysed. Some relevance and briefly presented. This is not relevant to the project.

Network Design in Netsim You must not use packet tracer. Screen capture of Netsim design. Write justification for the selected network design. 7 Outcomes Write at least 2 outcomes of the network 2 Limitations Write limitations of the hardware devices used in your design. 2 Conclusions Write a clear conclusion of the case study. 2 Demonstration Demonstrate to your instructor during Week-7 lab the detailed network design on Netsim, with justifications explained. 10 Reference style Follow IEEE reference style 5 Total 50

Marking criteria: Section to be included in the report Description of the section Marks Project scope Outline of the report ( in 3-4 sentences) 2 Challenges Write at least 3 appropriate challenges you might face during network setup. 3 User-centric design concept The process to incorporate user-centric design concept in your design. 5 Project hardware requirements - Name of the network device with manufacturer’s name, series, model, features and ports - Type of the cables - Name of the server, PC with specification such as operating system, RAM, hard disk etc. 8 2 2

Submission Guidelines ? All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page. ? The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. ? Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style.