Integrated your citations into the narrative, acknowledged all sources and consistently adhered to Harvard referencing rules throughout, both in-text and in reference list Integrated your citations into the narrative, acknowledged all sources and adhered to Harvard referencing rules throughout, with only minor errors Acknowledged most sources and adhered to most Harvard referencing rules in-text and in the reference list Acknowledged some sources and adhered to most Harvard referencing rules in-text and/or in the reference list; more in- text citation needed Used your own style of referencing OR have not referenced your sources adequately.

Communicates in academic writing, substantiating work with scholarly literature and using Harvard style Consistently communicated in fluent academic language with coherent, concise and cohesive sentences and logically flowing paragraphs, in a full essay structure that includes introduction, body and conclusion Predominantly communicated in fluent academic language with coherent, concise and cohesive sentences and logically flowing paragraphs, in a full essay structure that includes introduction, body and conclusion Mostly communicated in fluent academic language with coherent and cohesive sentences and paragraphs in a full essay structure that includes introduction, body and conclusion Communicated in academic language with coherent sentences which may include colloquialisms or extraneous details OR in a partial essay structure Used a casual writing style with colloquialisms and/or extraneous details OR the paper lacks flow and hence is challenging to read and understand

Provided strong support for both your chosen topic and your stated position Provided support for both your chosen topic and your stated position Provided some support for your chosen topic and/or your position at a surface level Provided minimal support for your chosen topic and/or position Not supported your themes or position Consistently incorporated this seamlessly into your discussion Predominantly incorporated this well into your discussion Referred to this throughout your discussion Referred to this occasionally in parts of your discussion Not incorporated the interviews into the discussion

Ability to access information from key stakeholders and to incorporate this as interviews into written work In your discussion of the interview material, you have: Demonstrated a structured and/or planned approach to gaining information on a focused and well-thought-out topic Demonstrated a structured and/or planned approach to gaining information on a focused topic Demonstrated some structure or planned approach to gaining information on a focused topic Demonstrated minimal planning to gaining information OR conversation was on a general topic Given no evidence of the interview plan or structure OR there is no examination of a topic

Integrated the literature into your discussion to produce a well synthesized argument that clearly demonstrated your own interpretation, opinions and understanding of the topic Integrated the literature into your discussion to produce a synthesized argument that demonstrates your understanding of the topic Included the literature in your discussion to produce an argument that supports your understanding of the topic Referred to the literature in your discussion to suggest your understanding OR relied on the authors’ opinions Overlooked the literature in your discussion

Appropriate literature is incorporated to support argument in a synthesized essay In your essay, you have: Supported your discussion with extensive and relevant and literature drawn from quality scholarly sources beyond the unit readings. Supported your discussion with relevant literature drawn from scholarly sources beyond the unit readings. Supported your discussion with relevant literature drawn from the unit readings and some scholarly sources Supported your discussion with minimal relevant literature from some scholarly sources and/or relied on unit readings Used support from general or non-scholarly literature or literature of limited relevance to nursing or midwifery, OR have relied on your own knowledge

Fail (NN) Mentioned a topic but not explained its relevance or applicability OR have not explained your topic No position is outlined, OR leadership theory is not mentioned, OR discussion shows misunderstanding or misinterpretation of leadership theory Not provided a logical or consistent argument about the topic

Credit (CR) Chosen a relevant topic and drawn some links to show the applicability to nursing or midwifery practice Taken a position on the topic which draws on key themes from the literature and interviews, and have discussed these to demonstrate a developing understanding of leadership theory Sustained a consistent argument throughout, although the conclusion could be more strongly supported Pass (PP) Chosen a relevant topic and implied the applicability to nursing or midwifery practice clear Inferred your position on the topic and mentioned some aspects of leadership theory Provided some discussion on the topic, but the conclusion is not supported OR there is no conclusion

Distinction (DN) Chosen a focussed and relevant topic and drawn links to show the applicability to nursing or midwifery practice Taken a clear position on the topic which draws on key themes from the literature and interviews, and have discussed these to demonstrate your understanding of leadership theory Sustained a consistent and logical argument throughout, which comes to a well- supported conclusion

CNA 802 Assessment Task 1, Semester 1, Criteria High Distinction (HD) The extent to which a clear position is argued and sustained for the topic selected, and the degree of relevance for nursing or midwifery practice In your essay, you have: Chosen a focussed and relevant topic and drawn strong links to show the applicability to nursing or midwifery practice Taken a clear position on the topic which draws on key themes from the literature and interviews, and have discussed and critiqued these to demonstrate a deep understanding of leadership theory Sustained a consistent and logical argument throughout, which comes to a compelling and well- supported conclusion.

I have attached the task requirement for this assignment . In total , i need 1. 2 set of interview question(same) with answer 2. 3500 words of essay about it . 3. Referencing Harvard style. 4. Incorporating interviews into text. I have attach the rubric for the interview paper and essay as well. The reading list (literature)i have attached is the requirement to use for the essay.Of course it can be more (15 or more ). if possible because is my first time i am not sure will the answer and essay fitted the requirement. If it does work, i will ask for more help with my next assignment . Thank you so much .