Reference no: EM132369599

Students are to observe two or more adults unknown to the observer. The student must not be able to hear the subjects being observed and those being observed must not be wearing a uniform of any kind as this would provide information about their occupation to the observer. Students must describe the environment and the people being observed, i.e., age, gender, dress, etc. Discuss the nonverbal communication, i.e. eye contact, body position and any other nonverbal behavior. Provide your interpretation of the relationship between those being observed. Be very discrete and do not have a conversation with those being observed.

Main post 300 words

reply post 200 words

with 2 APA references

Classmate post:

The primary effect of nonverbal communication holds that it can be applied being the replacement of any verbal communication (Adler, 2016). For instance, while talking on phone if someone proceeds toward the entrance of your place, one may approach for the individual to get in furthermore provide a space. Certain nonverbal words express arrived in also hold a place.

All nonverbal signals ought nearly immediate impact be the customers look them immediately. For instance, it needs more short time to notice a color or image and to try a horn either alarm than to chat out furthermore assume either to learn also know the conversation. I saw tow traffic police officers when I was going to my friend's house one day. they were talking to each other a stopped a guy going on motor bike. By seeing their gesture and expressions looks like they are asking him some questions and the guy has shown some of his documents from his bike pocket. The biker was talking and hosing some signs and talking to the traffic police and looks like the biker doesn't have some documents the police men wrote and gave a receipt to the biker and with his signs and his facial expression felt that the police was giving some warning to the biker. And the biker left with some sadness in his face.

To some well-defined regulations that remain accessible for communications, the regulations concerning these further complex interactions remain inevitable. Although, empirical conclusions present some agreement in particular encoding besides the decoding regarding nonverbal signs. while judging verbal thoughts, further than part the variation within the importance of nonverbal signs can imply within a three-dimensional structure: positiveness, potency conversely state, furthermore responsiveness (Mehrabian, 2017).

References:

Adler, R. B., Rodman, G. R., & Du Pré, A. (2016). Understanding human communication (Vol. 10). Oxford University Press.

Mehrabian, A. (2017). Nonverbal communication. Routledge.