Reference no: EM132283422
Exercise -
Q1. Consider the following principal components solution with five variables using no rotation and then a varimax rotation. Only the first two components are given, because the eigenvalues corresponding to the remaining components were very small (< .3).
Variables
|
Unrotated solution
|
Varimax solution
|
Comp 1
|
Comp 2
|
Comp 1
|
Comp 2
|
1
|
.581
|
.806
|
.016
|
.994
|
2
|
.767
|
-.545
|
.941
|
-.009
|
3
|
.672
|
.726
|
.137
|
.980
|
4
|
.932
|
-.104
|
.825
|
.447
|
5
|
.791
|
-.558
|
.968
|
-.006
|
(a) Find the amount and percent of variance accounted for by each unrotated component.
(b) Find the amount and percent of variance accounted for by each varimax rotated component.
(c) Compare the variance accounted for by each unrotated component with the variance accounted for by each corresponding rotated component.
(d) Compare (to 2 decimal places) the total amount and percent of variance accounted for by the two unrotated components with the total amount and percent of variance accounted for by the two rotated components. Does rotation change the variance accounted for by the two components?
(e) Compute the communality (to two decimal places) for the first observed variable using the loadings from the (i) unrotated loadings and (ii) loadings following rotation. Do communalities change with rotation?
Q2. Using the correlation matrix shown in Table 9.3, run an exploratory factor analysis (as illustrated in section 9.12) using principal axis extraction with direct quartimin rotation.
(a) Confirm that the use of Kaiser's rule (using the unreduced correlation matrix) and use of parallel analysis as discussed in sections 9.11 and 9.12 (using the reduced correlation matrix) provide support for a tewo factor solution.
(b) Do the values in the pattern matrix provide support for the two-factor solution that was obtained in section 9.7?
(c) Are the factors correlated?
Q3. For additional practice in conducting an exploratory factor analysis, run an exploratory factor analysis using principal axis extraction using the correlation shown in Table 9.7 but do not include the bodily symptom items. Run a two-and three-factor solution for the remaining nine items.
(a) Which solution(s) have empirical support?
(b) Which solution seems more conceptually meaningful?
Q4. Bolton (1971) measured 159 deaf rehabilitation candidates on 10 communication skills, of which six were reception skills in unaided hearing, aided hearing, speech reading, reading, manual signs, and finger spellings. The other four communication skills were expression skills: oral speech, writing, manual signs, and finger-spelling. Bolton conducted an exploratory factor analysis using principal axis extraction with a varimax rotation. He obtained the following correlation matrix and varimax factor solution:
Correlation Matrix of Communication Variables for 159 Deaf Persons
|
|
C1
|
C2
|
C3
|
C4
|
C5
|
C6
|
C7
|
C8
|
C9
|
C10
|
M
|
S
|
C1
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
0.45
|
C2
|
59
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.49
|
1.06
|
C3
|
30
|
34
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.56
|
1.17
|
C4
|
16
|
24
|
62
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.63
|
1.11
|
C5
|
-02
|
-13
|
28
|
37
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.30
|
1.50
|
C6
|
00
|
-05
|
42
|
51
|
90
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
2.90
|
1.44
|
C7
|
39
|
61
|
70
|
59
|
05
|
20
|
71
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
1.31
|
C8
|
17
|
29
|
57
|
88
|
30
|
46
|
60
|
78
|
|
|
2.42
|
1.04
|
C9
|
-04
|
-14
|
28
|
33
|
93
|
86
|
04
|
25
|
92
|
|
3.25
|
1.49
|
C10
|
-04
|
-08
|
42
|
50
|
87
|
94
|
17
|
45
|
90
|
94
|
2.89
|
1.41
|
Note - The italicized diagonal values are squared multiple correlations.
Varimax Factor Solutions for 10 Communication Variables for 159 Deaf Persons
|
|
|
I
|
II
|
C1
|
Hearing (unaided)
|
|
49
|
C2
|
Hearing (aided)
|
|
66
|
C3
|
Speech reading
|
32
|
70
|
C4
|
Reading
|
45
|
71
|
C5
|
Manual signs
|
94
|
|
C6
|
Finger-spelling
|
94
|
|
C7
|
Speech
|
|
86
|
C8
|
Writing
|
38
|
72
|
C9
|
Manual signs
|
34
|
|
C10
|
Fingerspelling
|
96
|
|
Percent of common variance
|
53.8
|
39.3
|
Note: Factor loadings less than .30 are omitted.
(a) Interpret the varimax factors. What does each of them represent?
(b) Does the way the variables that define factor 1 correspond to the way they are correlated? That is, is the empirical clustering of the variables by the principal axis technique consistent with the way those variables go together in the original correlation matrix?
Q5. Consider the following part of the quote from Pedhazur and Schmelkin (1991): "It boils down to the question: Are aspects of a postulated multidimensional construct intercorrelated? The answer to this question is relegated to the status of an assumption when an orthogonal rotation is employed". What did they mean by the last part of this statement?
Note - Please answer the questions 2, 3 and 4 from exercise.
Attachment:- Assignment Files.rar