Reference no: EM133092810

Post a total of 2 substantive responses over 2 separate days for full participation. This includes your initial post by Saturday and at least 1 reply to classmates or your faculty member by Monday.

Please refer to this week's learning materials. They are intended to help you engage effectively in this discussion.

Part 1: Institutional Review Board (IRB)

-Visit CDS Central and review the information under the IRB tab.

-Select Registering for IRB in the IRB Resources table and follow the steps to register.

Once you have registered with IRB, download the What is Research? document at the end of the list of Forms and Templates.

As the first part of your response, describe in your own words (approximately 150-200 words) what research is and explain if your study will involve human subjects.

Part 2: Research Ethics

The development of the field of ethics in research includes numerous historical atrocities and egregious breaches of humane ethical values.

For the second part of your response, research "historical atrocities and research ethics" and share one historical violation that prompted the implementation of ethical standards in research (approximately 150-200 words).

Include your own experience as well as 2 citations from peer-reviewed academic journals, industry publications, books, and/or other sources that align with or contradict your comments. Cite your sources according to APA guidelines. If you found information that contradicts your experience, explain why you agree or disagree with the information.

Due Monday

Review your classmates' posts and respond to at least one in a minimum of 150 words.?Explain why you agree or disagree. Then, share an example from your professional experience to support your assertions.