Appropriate resources and correct referencing (2 marks). Used four or more sources. All work has been referenced correctly as per Harvard referencing. requirements. Used two or more sources. All work has been referenced correctly as per Harvard referencing. requirements. Used one or more sources. All work has been referenced within the body of the answer and in the reference list, with some omissions or errors in terms. No additional sources (other than the textbook) used. Others’ work is not always acknowledged and there are a number of errors or non-compliance with the Harvard referencing. requirements.

Professional communication using a business report format. (Note: you are required to space between paragraphs; use Times New Roman 12 pt; use 1.5 or double line spacing) (2 marks). Work is in a report format and contains distinct understandable statements with no errors. There is a sophisticated use of language. Extremely well organised. Content is structured in a manner that facilitates the reader’s understanding. Work is in a report format and contains distinct understandable statements with minimal errors. Answer is well organised. Content is structured in a manner that facilitates the reader’s understanding. Work is in a report format. There are minor spelling, grammar and punctuation errors. Work shows evidence of proofreading. Well-structured with one main idea or argument provided per paragraph arguments/ideas Some spelling, grammar and punctuation errors found but the work is readable and structured. Some attempt at a business report format. Work may include too many ideas in one paragraph.

Identification and evaluation of the influences of balance sheet and income statement ratios and risk assessment and evaluate potential audit risk and respond to risk (8 marks) Provides a comprehensive synthesis and critical evaluation of the influences of balance sheet and income statement ratios and risk assessment and evaluate potential audit risk and respond to risk. Provides an advanced synthesis and critical evaluation of balance sheet and income statement ratios and risk assessment and evaluate potential audit risk and respond to risk. Provides at least a competent evaluation of risk assessment and respond to risk. Provides a competent synthesis and critical evaluation of balance sheet and income statement ratios and risk assessment and evaluate potential audit risk and respond to risk. Provides a basic evaluation of the remaining component. Provides a basic critical evaluation balance sheet and income statement ratios and risk assessment and evaluate potential audit risk and respond to risk; failure to evaluate proper risk assessment and reduction to potential risk.

Criteria High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Use of critical and reflective judgment in corporate governance principles practice in the application of the ASX CGC guide (8 marks) Complex and detailed application of the corporate governance decision guide demonstrating strong critical and reflective thinking the use of the guide. There are extensive relevant references to ASX CGC principles. Logical application of the corporate governance decision guide demonstrating strong critical and reflective thinking the use of the guide. There are wide-ranging relevant references to ASX CGC principles. Minor problems with the application of the corporate governance decision guide demonstrating strong critical and reflective thinking the use of the guide There are some relevant references to ASX CGC principles. Provide basic application of the corporate governance decision guide demonstrating strong critical and reflective thinking the use of the guide including some references to ASX CGC principles.