All the necessary things that have been mentioned in the pictures have been properly considered and on basis of those, all the changes in different sections have been made. The points to be explained and made changes have also been done properly. Extra references have also been added in order to make the statements more authentic. Thus, all the things directed, have been clearly followed and the changes have been made. Thanks

I will send u notes from the teacher bay attached, pleases see and tell me please find the attached 26348539_1WhatsApp Image 21 at 111247 AM.jpeg 26348556_2WhatsApp Image 21 at 111221 AM.jpeg 26348573_3WhatsApp Image 21 at 111038 AM.jpeg suplement 26348535_1WhatsApp Image 21 at 110911 AM.jpeg 26348535_2WhatsApp Image 21 at 110849 AM.jpeg 26348535_3WhatsApp Image 21 at 110828 AM.jpeg supplement 26348554_1WhatsApp Image 21 at 110811 AM.jpeg 26348554_2WhatsApp Image 21 at 110757 AM.jpeg 26348586_3WhatsApp Image 21 at 110624 AM.jpeg supplement 26348564_1WhatsApp Image 21 at 110617 AM.jpeg I have same comment please find attachment kindly try to finish it by today tomorrow I have to submit. and follow the ref as per attached, 26348564_1WhatsApp Image 26 at 34650 PM.jpeg 26348564_2WhatsApp Image 26 at 34651 PM00000.jpeg 26348564_3WhatsApp Image .jpeg kindly find second attachment 26348544_1WhatsApp Image 26 .jpeg 26348544_2WhatsApp Image 26 at 34651 .jpeg 26348576_3WhatsApp Image 26 at 34652 PM.jpeg

30-39% Retrievable fail Some learning outcomes and / or assessment criteria not met. Questions not answered fully. Content not wholly relevant. Little or no evidence of understanding of relevant theory. Very repetitive of taught input – no development or application. The use of extensive quoted passages evident. Evidence of sufficient grasp of learning outcomes to suggest that the participant will be able to retrieve the module on resubmission. 20-29% No learning outcomes fully met. Little attempt to engage with the module materials or ideas. 10-19% Little attempt to engage with assignment brief and has not met learning outcomes. Inadequate demonstration of knowledge or understanding of key concepts, theories or practice. 0-9% No real attempt to address the assignment brief or learning outcomes

50-59% Main issues addressed and solid attempt to answer question. Some relevant Competent content applied. Sound knowledge and understanding of relevant theory and concepts and identification of main issues Some repeated errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate. 40-49% Basic Satisfactory attempt to address question/issues with some content relevant to assignment topic. Material engages with relevant module materials, but largely repeats taught input and lacks development or personal interpretation. Some general understanding of topic theory and concepts. Lacks coherence.

70-79% Very good Full response to the assignment with all content relevant and focused. Very good understanding of relevant theory, concepts and models. Application of appropriate theory to examples/practice, demonstrating a rigorous approach to a variety of ideas, contexts and frameworks. Few errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate. 60-69% Good Answers most if not all detailed aspects of the question. Content mainly relevant. Good knowledge and understanding of relevant theory and concepts and application of theoretical models. Evidence of a developing appreciation of contextual issues. Some small repeated errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate

90-100% Outstanding Exceptionally detailed and original response to the assignment, with critical use of independently sourced contextual material. Outstanding demonstration of linked understanding of relevant theory, concepts and models. Extremely well structured with high level of analysis. No obvious errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate. 80-89% Excellent Very full, independent response to the assignment with totally relevant material which is well beyond any module input, demonstrating independent study. Excellent understanding of relevant theory, concepts and models. Very clear logical structure. Very few errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate.

3. The report should be done in Word, font size 12, font style Times New Roman, text colour black, colours can be used ONLY in appendices; main body of the report should be black and white. 4. The assignment should have a cover page, table of contents, introduction, and answers to the questions, conclusion, and appropriate references. Remember to credit all sources of information that you use, in your text and in the references. Please use Coventry Harvard style of referencing. 5. Appendices. You may attach appendices to your work, if you think them necessary – they will not be included in the word-count. 6. Last date of submission: 12th week of the semester 7. The assignment should be submitted on time through Moodle. Late submission shall be penalised as per the norms of MEC mentioned in the Module Information Guide and Plagiarism Policy stated below. 8. Plagiarism Policy.

Instructions for the assignment: 1. This is an Individual Project. All set books, journals and internet sources should be used for adequate answers. Thorough analysis will be highly rewarded. Journal articles: Students are required to use a minimum of five (5) relevant journal articles in the body of the assignment and reference them correctly under Reference section. Any assignment without the required journal articles will not qualify for A Grade as a rule. 2. Total words count should not exceed 2500-3000 words. Annexure(s) will not be considered for number of words. State number of words on cover page. There is no word limit.

Learning Outcomes of the Module On completion of this module the student should be able to: 1. Critically analyse the implications of national and international legal environments of businesses in the Sultanate of Oman. 2. Analyse the key features of the judicial system of Oman. 3. Use appropriate sources for general legal analysis by identifying information, legal issues and reaching conclusions based on analysis. Assessments and learning outcomes mapping: Assessment Methods 1 2 3 4 5 6 Individual Assignment 2 – 60% x x

Instructions to Student: • This is an individual assignment. • Students should answer all questions after reading the case. • Answer all 5 questions • Report needs to be submitted individually. • Relevant Oman statutes should be quoted and Oman examples used right through. • Thorough analysis of issues will be highly rewarded. • Submission date: week 12 • Assessment is subject to MEC viva policy. • Marks will be scaled down to 60% after marking in line with MEC policy.