Criteria Marks Introduction /0.5 Summary of each team member’s selected articles /2 Integrated Content /4 Conclusion /0.5 Presentation Style eg clarity, engagement /0.5 Review of another team’s presentation /2.5 SubTotal-2 /10

Referencing /2 marks Correct referencing (APA). All quoted material in quotes and acknowledged. All paraphrased material acknowledged. Correctly set out reference list. Mostly correct referencing (APA). All quoted material in quotes &acknowledged. All paraphrased material acknowledged. Mostly correct setting out reference list. Mostly correct referencing (APA ) Some problems with quoted material and paraphrased material Some problems with the reference list. Not all material correctly acknowledged. Some problems with the reference list. AppendixIndividual Summary Displays deep analysis of issues. Displays sound understanding with some analysis of issues Displays some understanding and analysis of issues. Inadequate discussion of issues.

Case Study /2 marks Case study clearly reflects at least one of the points discussed and the lessons learned Case study clearly reflects the topic discussed, but lessons are not well abstracted Case study is relevant but does not clearly reflect the point of discussion Case study is irrelevant to the topic of discussion Conclusion /1 mark An interesting, well written summary of the main points. An excellent final comment on the subject, based on the information provided. A good summary of the main points. A good final comment on the subject, based on the information provided. Satisfactory summary of the main points. A final comment on the subject, but introduced new material. Poor/no summary of the main points. A poor final comment on the subject and/or new material introduced.

Discussion of topics /4marks All topics discussed in depth. Displays deep analysis of issues with no irrelevant info. Consistently detailed discussion. Displays sound understanding with some analysis of issues and no irrelevant information Most topics are adequately discussed. Displays some understanding and analysis of issues. Inadequate discussion of issues Little/no demonstrated understanding or analysis of most issues and/or some irrelevant information.

Discussion of topics /4marks All topics discussed in depth. Displays deep analysis of issues with no irrelevant info. Consistently detailed discussion. Displays sound understanding with some analysis of issues and no irrelevant information Most topics are adequately discussed. Displays some understanding and analysis of issues. Inadequate discussion of issues Little/no demonstrated understanding or analysis of most issues and/or some irrelevant information. Case Study /2 marks Case study clearly reflects at least one of the points discussed and the lessons learned Case study clearly reflects the topic discussed, but lessons are not well abstracted Case study is relevant but does not clearly reflect the point of discussion Case study is irrelevant to the topic of discussion

Structure /1 mark Structure guidelines enhanced Structure guidelines followed exactly Structure guidelines mostly followed. Some elements of structure omitted Introduction /1 mark Introduces the topic of the report in an extremely engaging manner which arouses the reader's interest. Gives a detailed general background and indicates the overall "plan" of the paper. Introduces the topic of the report in an engaging manner which arouses the reader's interest. Gives some general background and indicates the overall "plan" of the paper. Satisfactorily introduces the topic of the report. Gives a general background. Indicates the overall "plan" of the paper. Introduces the topic of the report, but omits a general background of the topic and/or the overall "plan" of the paper.

Score Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory (0) Presentation /Layout /1 mark Information is well organized, well written, and proper grammar and punctuation are used throughout. Correct layout used. Information is organized, well written, with proper grammar and punctuation. Correct layout used. Information is somewhat organized, proper grammar and punctuation mostly used. Correct layout used. Information is somewhat organized, but proper grammar and punctuation not always used. Some elements of layout incorrect.

Hard-copy to tutors/lecturers assignment box in week 11. Doublesided printing for the hard-copy is encouraged in order to save paper. Declaration should be done to declare how much (percentage) each students has contributed to the report. A passing grade will be awarded to assignments adequately addressing all assessment criteria. Higher grades require better quality and more effort. For example, a minimum is set on the wider reading required. A student reading vastly more than this minimum will be better prepared to discuss the issues in depth and consequently their report is likely to be of a higher quality. So before submitting, please read through the assessment criteria very carefully.