4.Clarity of expression, grammar, spelling, final summary and correct APA style referencing (out of 4 marks) Marks available • The writing is difficult to follow, with incoherent or illogical arguments. • There are many errors of spelling or grammar. • Sections are unrelated. • No citations are included in the text of the essay, and there is no reference list at the end. • The arguments make sense in places, but there are also illogical arguments, confusing sentences or sudden changes of topic. • There are numerous errors of spelling and grammar. • There is a reference list but it does not comply with APA refererencing style • Most statements are clear but some require re- reading and guessing about meaning as they are not clear. • Sentence structure can be improved for simplicity, clarity and ease of comprehension. • Few grammar or spelling errors • APA referencing style is used with some format errors or inconsistencies. • Statements are clear and well-connected. There is a logical flow of ideas.

Ways or areas to implement lean project management • Did not mention any best practices to implement lean project management • Did not describes the areas of waste that is to reduced or eliminated • Did not describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. • Identified ONE best practice to implement lean project management • Vaguely describes the areas of waste that is to reduced or eliminated • Did not describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. • Identified TWO best practice to implement lean project management • Satisfactorily describes the areas of waste that is to reduced or eliminated • Did not describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. • Identified THREE best practice to implement lean project management • Clearly describes the areas of waste that is to reduced or eliminated • Did not describes how the case will be addressed and gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on.

Marks available (out of 3 marks) 0 0.5 / 1.0 / 1.5 2.0 / 2.5 / 3.0 1b. Correct identification of critical stakeholders • Totally incorrect identification of stakeholders n/a Incomplete identification of stakeholders. Some stakeholders are identified but is difficult to read and does not relate n/a • Full list of stakeholder are identified and clearly described which includes all the relevant information. • Gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. 3

PPMP 20009 Marking Rubric Assessment 1 (Individual Work - 40%) Attributes Fail Developing Competent Accomplished Outstanding Marks Awarded 1a. Correct usage of processes for effective stakeholder management • Process for stakeholder management not identified n/a • Weak identification and description of Stakeholder Management processes n/a • There is a clear identification and description of the stakeholder management processes which includes all the relevant information. • Gives the reader a clear and compelling desire to read on. 3