Reference no: EM133853584
Assignment:
Please change the paragraphs below to simple, easy wording. please do not use AI. write in easy and simple sentences.
A power matrix is effective in the study of power conflicts because it aligns critical components of power players, power locations, and power interactions. In using a power matrix for this analysis, the following approach can be taken:
Identify Key Players and Power Bases:
Begin with identifying the major players in the conflict and sorting out the organisational influence sources.
These bases could include authority, expertise, economic power or uveal what has been referred to by Pfeiffer, 1992 as the public influence. For example, when examining the historical labour relations conflict, the strikers could be the labour unions while the counter strikers could be the business men and women who have power of finance and authority over the actions of employees.
Determine Power Instrument Types: Power resources are the tools by which each side makes force felt. It may involve bargaining, going on strike, lobbying, developing propaganda and among others. Listing such tools makes the nature of the conflict easier to understand and navigate (Mintzberg, 1983). For instance, labour unions are likely to threaten their members to perform some action, in this case striking while business organisations may threaten to withdraw financial incentives.
Analyse Outcomes (Positive-Sum, Zero-Sum, or Negative-Sum): Third, analyse the characteristics of the results with reference to dynamics and distribution of gains and losses within the struggle. This implies that the kind of solution that has been realized augments the amount of gain available in the social system to all players, generally because they cooperated. The first type means one partner benefits at the other's expense, and the second means both partners deteriorate (Axelrod, 1984). However, were the labour dispute lead to better wages without undermining company profitability, then this I am arguing is a win-win for all, However if gains for workers were to translate into losses for business, it will be a zero sum game. A long-strike detrimental to them both would be detrimental to everybody involved: a deflect would be created or made greater in this.
However, were the labour dispute lead to better wages without undermining company profitability, then this I am arguing is a win-win for all, However if gains for workers were to translate into losses for business, it will be a zero sum game. A long-strike detrimental to them both would be detrimental to everybody involved: a deficit would be created or made greater in this case.
Examine the Evolution of the Power
Relationship: This involves daunting as how might the power of a man or a tribe change over time? Sometimes, such struggles emerge after apologies develop new tactics or after outsiders intervene (Emerson, 1962). In a labour conflict for example, we may see that the first sources of power are vested in the business owner. But in the event that workers attract public support, bargaining power may shift to the union side of the relationship.
Speculate on Alternative Power
Instruments: Reflect whether, with the use of other tools, another result may have been possible. For instance, if labour unions had better employed negotiations over strikes, there could have been a better shot at the get win situation. Likewise, the very fact the business ought to have addressed the question of employee welfare preventatively could have reduced the requirement for a power struggle (Kotter, 1979).
This structured use of a power matrix reveals that the outcome of a power struggle can vary greatly depending on the strategies and tools used, underscoring the importance of strategic choice in achieving favourable outcomes.