Reference no: EM133214677
Need a Literature review
Article 1 - Does Text Complexity Matter in the Elementary Grades? A Research Synthesis of Text Difficulty and Elementary Students' Reading Fluency and Comprehension by Steven J. Amendum1, Kristin Conradi, and Elfrieda Hiebert
Article 2 - Assessment of 5th Graders' Reading Fluency in Urdu by Anum Dilawar, Mobeen-Ul-Islam
Article 3 - Individualized goal setting during repeated reading: Improving growth with struggling readers using data based instructional decisions by Stephanie M. Hammerschmidt-Snidarich , Jennifer J. McComas, and Gregory R. Simonson
Article 4 -ImprovIng oral readIng fluency and comprehensIon usIng grade-level fIctIon: a study of systematIc readIng remedIatIon wIth urban youth at rIsk for school faIlure
Article 5 - Identifying and discriminating expository text structures: An experiment with 4th and 5th grade struggling readers
Article 6 - What is Text Reading Fluency and Is It a Predictor or an Outcome of Reading Comprehension? A Longitudinal Investigation
Artilce 7 - Identification of struggling readers or at risk of reading difficulties with one-minute fluency measures
Artilce 8 - Efficacy of a Word- and Text-Based Intervention for Students With Significant Reading Difficulties
Artilce 9 - THE READING FLUENCY AND COMPREHENSION OF FIFTH- AND SIXTH-GRADE STRUGGLING READERS ACROSS BRIEF TESTS OF VARIOUS INTERVENTION APPROACHES
Artilce 10 - ENHANCING OUTCOMES FOR STRUGGLING READERS: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE FLUENCY DEVELOPMENT LESSONParagraph: Both descriptors addressed in a thorough, deep manner. Intro paragraph 1) states the thesis of the literature review and 2) previews the themes that will be presented.
Point 1: All 5 descriptors (see below) are addressed, and at least 4 are addressed in a thorough, deep, and effective manner. One descriptor could be addressed in a partial, shallow, or ineffective manner. Main descriptors: 1) Main point is clearly stated in the beginning of the section; 2) Evidence from two or more empirical articles supports the main point; 3)Evidence is critically evaluated; 4)Connections are made between the articles; and 5) Connection to the problem statement is made.
Point 2: All 5 descriptors are addressed, and at least 4 are addressed in a thorough, deep, and effective manner. One descriptor could be addressed in a partial, shallow, or ineffective manner. Main descriptors: 1) Main point is clearly stated in the beginning of the section; 2) Evidence from two or more empirical articles supports the main point; 3)Evidence is critically evaluated; 4)Connections are made between the articles; and 5) Connection to the problem statement is made.
Point 3: All 5 descriptors are addressed, and at least 4 are addressed in a thorough, deep, and effective manner. One descriptor could be addressed in a partial, shallow, or ineffective manner.Main descriptors: 1) Main point is clearly stated in the beginning of the section; 2) Evidence from two or more empirical articles supports the main point; 3)Evidence is critically evaluated; 4)Connections are made between the articles; and 5) Connection to the problem statement is made.