10.0 %Format 10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

5.0 %Presentation 5.0 %Presentation The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements. The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing. The presentation is good. The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional.

25.0 %Illustration The vector-borne disease is not clearly identified; sub-concepts do not consistently branch from main idea. The illustration does not address the majority of the assignment criteria. The vector-borne disease is not clearly identified; few sub-concepts branch appropriately. Limited understanding of assignment is apparent. The illustration addresses partial assignment criteria. The vector-borne disease is easily identified; few sub-concepts branch from main idea. Basic understanding of assignment. The illustration addresses all assignment criteria; however, one or two points may be ambiguous. The vector-borne disease is easily identified; most sub-concepts branch from main idea. Original and creative concept that fulfills parameters of assignment. The illustration addresses all assignment criteria. The vector-borne disease is easily identified; sub-concepts branch appropriately from main idea. Projects exhibit the process of creative thinking and the development of an individual style. The illustration addresses all assignment criteria.

25.0 %Narrative Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Narrative is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Narrative lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Narrative is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. Presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Narrative shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Global Warming and Vector-Borne Diseases (Benchmark Assignment) 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00% 3 Satisfactory 79.00% 4 Good 87.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 85.0 %Content 35.0 %Individual disease and global warming subject knowledge Includes little knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge is not evident. Includes little knowledge about the topic with few supporting details and examples. Little subject knowledge is evident. Includes knowledge about the topic with supporting details and examples. Some subject knowledge is evident. Includes essential knowledge about the topic with supporting details and examples. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Covers topic in-depth with extensive details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent.