Instructions: Need 5000 words. Share Grammarly report along with the solution. RESEARCH AREA / SUBJECT AREA = Thriving at work: Antecedents (The research paper must in this area) There is an 'Research project guidelines 2', it is the guidelines that provide by my lecturer. You may ignore it if it is not useful for you. Please, only do INTRODUCTION, LITERATURE REVIEW, AND METHODOLOGY ONLY. INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES - This assignment will contribute 100% to your final grade. The assignment must be typewritten on 1.5 lines spacing, A-4 size paper and single sided. Work should be presented according to professional academic research writing format with a cover page (refer to Appendix A). Marks will be allocated for content, presentation, and referencing.

Extensions and Late Submissions - The University requires students to adhere to submission deadlines for any form of assessment. Penalties applied in relation to unauthorized late submission of work are as follows: Coursework submitted within one week after the deadline will be accepted for a maximum mark of 40%. Any coursework handed in after seven days, without an agreed extension, will be regarded as non-submission and awarded zero. Submission of re-sit coursework must adhere strictly to the deadline. No extension will be given, and late submissions will be awarded zero. Subject lecturers are authorized to grant extensions for coursework within their own subjects and agreements will be documented.

Marking guideline is as follows (Please refer Appendix B for marking rubrics): 81 - 100 marks - An excellent piece of work showing very sensible, coherent and critical thought about the research to be carried out and the structure and content of the research project. Very minor suggestions for amendments. 61 - 80 marks - Very good on the whole, but the supervisor needs to discuss possible minor amendments with the student about some aspects. 41 - 60 marks - Generally okay, a reasonable amount of sensible thought demonstrated, but perhaps not sufficiently clear, coherent, well-structured or thought out. Probably the supervisor needs to suggest a number of modifications. 21 - 40 marks - Not very good though not irretrievably awful. Supervisor needs to take a firm stand here and suggest major modification. 0 - 20 marks - Fail - Student has not fully grasped the philosophy and research. Student might have to repeat the subject before moving on to the next phase.

Length of proposal - A typical research proposal is within the range of 5,000 words EXCLUDING preliminary pages, references and appendices. If you propose to exceed this limit by a serious amount (e.g. 2,000 words or more) you need to obtain prior approval from the subject lecturer, otherwise your mark may be reduced. Academic Proposal Format: Font type: Times New Roman. Font size: 12-pt. Spacing: 1.5 lines spacing (before & after: 6-pt). Alignment: Justify. Page number: lower case roman numeral (e.g. i,ii,iii...) for preliminary pages; Arabic numeral (1,2,3,4...) for content, references and appendices.

Deliverables - Students are required to submit the final copy of their proposal (in MS Word Format including programme code, student ID and student full name, e.g. BBM_13131222_Goh Ci Xi) via EMAIL to the subject lecturer (please refer subject overview for email address) according to the requested format by the deadline (By Week 13, 17, 12pm). No further extensions shall be given, so it is advisable to submit the research project proposal as early as possible before the deadline. Submission that do not follow the prescribed format may not be accepted. Both email and turn-it-in submissions are required no later than the deadline given. If student fail to submit any of these submissions, it will still be considered as "INCOMPLETE." Subsequent submission after the deadline will be considered as "LATE SUBMISSION."

Qualitative Method Marking Rubrics - Section 1: Introduction (20 marks) - Context/scope clearly delineated; adequately supported by the literature; demonstrates knowledge of key issues and debates related to the topic; relevant studies critiqued and used to support study and researcher's learning. Comprehensive identification of issue(s)/ problem(s) which is/are clearly stated and explained. Comprehensively link components of the problem(s) with depth of analysis. Purpose of study reflecting research motivation is clear and well articulated. Research questions are succinctly stated, connected to the research issue, and supported by the literature. Has substantial contribution and relevant to theory, industry and policy.

Literature Review (20 marks) - Good sources of up-to date literature. Relevant and focused literature with good discussion on deficiencies in the literature. Comprehensive identification and sound understanding of theories and concepts. Clearly demonstrates ability to synthesise literature to identify research problem/gap. Review is critical in nature and identifies trends, evidence and conclusions in relevant literature. Ability to conduct critical comparative analysis between literatures to arrive at the research problem. Ideas are clear, sound and coherently articulated. Significant application and analysis of theories and concepts with relevant examples. Linking of theoretical lens or perspective to address research question is clear, coherent and well articulated.

Methodology (30 marks) - Identification of appropriate paradigm with justified explanation of priority linking back to research objective. Describes the research paradigm including ontological and epistemological assumptions and how these shapes the choice of design and methodology; link the choice of methodology to the type of data sought and questions asked and nature of the phenomenon under investigation, design incorporates tenets of qualitative research. Procedures were thorough, manageable, coherent, and powerful for generating valid and reliable data. Procedures were chronological and replicable, with clear distinctions between researcher and participant actions. Ethical considerations are given thought.

Sampling process and criteria are clearly stated and grounded in the literature (substantive and methodological), sampling processes are ethical, aligned with the research questions and conceptual or theoretical framework. Participants, sites, and settings are well addressed. Saturation point is clearly articulated and justified with good references. Undertakes extensive measures (i.e. member's checks, memoing etc) in planning to minimize biases arising from researcher's interpretation, and this justification is comprehensively grounded with literature. Data analysis procedures are clearly explained and detailed, includes rationale for selection of approach(es) to analysis; alignment with research questions and theoretical/conceptual framework. Grounded in the literature.

References (10 Marks) -Extract and synthesize information from good and reliable sources. Very minor corrections in APA Style Referencing. All references cited in text matches with all references listed. Appropriate number of references used to show relevant independent reading of major core articles and text. Very minor formatting corrections in both reference list and throughout report. Organisation, Structure and Format (10 Marks) - Structure of the proposal is clear and easy to follow. Points presented in each section are well connected. Good format, spelling and grammar. Student's Effort (10 Marks) - On time and prepared for class. Maintains 100% effort throughout all class activities. Maintains a positive attitude and is enthusiastic throughout class activities.