Expertsmind.com is extremely devoted writing service. They helped me when I had only four days to present my assignment. I am extremely happy with their work and now I have given my new assignments also to task offer assistance.

Expert Suggested below companies. Please choose the same and update us to proceed further : Wesfarmers, Woolworth and BHP Billiton OR 1. Adelaide Brighton Limited 2. Sims Metal Management 3. Amcor Limited 4. Alumina Limited Woolworths!! N i can give time till ## midnight!! Although the deadline till ## pm!!

Score Very Good (10/10) Good (7/10) Satisfactory (5/10) Unsatisfactory (3/10) Conclusion /10 marks An interesting, well written summary of the main points. An excellent final comment on the subject, based on the information provided. A good summary of the main points. A good final comment on the subject, based on the information provided. Satisfactory summary of the main points. A final comment on the subject, but introduced new material. Poor/no summary of the main points. A poor final comment on the subject and/or new material introduced. Score Very Good (10/10) Good (7/10) Satisfactory (5/10) Unsatisfactory (3/10) Referencing /10 marks Correct referencing (Harvard) All quoted material in quotes and acknowledged. All paraphrased material acknowledged. Correctly set out reference list and bibliography included. Mostly correct referencing (Harvard) All quoted material in quotes and acknowledged. All paraphrased material acknowledged. Mostly correct setting out reference list and bibliography included. Mostly correct referencing (Harvard)

Score Very Good (30/30) Good (23/30) Satisfactory (16/30) Unsatisfactory (10/30) Development of Discussion /30 marks Logical, insightful, original discussion with well- connected paragraphs. Evidence of full engagement with the literature found, with relevant and detailed analysis. Detailed, original discussion develops logically with some connection between adjoining paragraphs. Understanding of reading shown. Some relevant analysis. Adequate discussion develops logically. Understanding of reading shown. Few relevant analysis. Inadequate discussion of issues and/or lacking in logical flow Little/no demonstrated understanding of reading. None/little discussion or analysis.

Score Very Good (10/10) Good (7/10) Satisfactory (5/10) Unsatisfactory (3/10) Conclusion /10 marks An interesting, well written summary of the main points. An excellent final comment on the subject, based on the information provided. A good summary of the main points. A good final comment on the subject, based on the information provided. Satisfactory summary of the main points. A final comment on the subject, but introduced new material. Poor/no summary of the main points. A poor final comment on the subject and/or new material introduced. Score Very Good (10/10) Good (7/10) Satisfactory (5/10) Unsatisfactory (3/10) Referencing Correct referencing (Harvard) All quoted material in quotes Mostly correct referencing Mostly correct referencing Not all material correctly

Score Very Good (20/20) Good (15/20) Satisfactory (10/20) Unsatisfactory (7/20) Evidence of Research /20 marks Substantial range of appropriate and current, supportive evidence Good range of appropriate and current, supportive evidence. Suitable range of supportive evidence used. Not always appropriate and/or current. Minimum cited. Insufficient range or number of supportive evidence used. HI5019 STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS T2 Score Very Good (30/30) Good (23/30) Satisfactory (16/30) Unsatisfactory (10/30) Development of Discussion /30 marks Logical, insightful, original discussion with well- connected paragraphs. Evidence of full engagement with the literature found, with relevant and detailed analysis. Detailed, original discussion develops logically with some connection between adjoining paragraphs. Understanding of reading shown. Some relevant analysis. Adequate discussion develops logically. Understanding of reading shown. Few relevant analysis. Inadequate discussion of issues and/or lacking in logical flow Little/no demonstrated understanding of reading. None/little discussion or analysis.

Assessment Criteria: Score Very Good (15/15) Good (11/15) Satisfactory (9/15) Unsatisfactory (5/15) Presentation and writing style /15 marks Information is well organized. Correct layout including times new roman, font size 12 or calibri, font size10, double spaced. About the right length. Very well written, excellent paraphrasing and proper grammar and punctuation are used throughout. Information is organized, Correct layout including times new roman, font size 12 or calibri, font size10, double spaced. About the right length. Well written, some paraphrasing and proper grammar and punctuation Information is somewhat organized, Some elements of layout or length incorrect. Proper grammar and punctuation mostly used, but overuse of direct quotes. Information is poorly organized, Some elements of layout or length incorrect. Proper grammar and punctuation not always used. Excessive overuse of direct quotes Score Very Good (15/15) Good (11/15) Satisfactory (9/15) Unsatisfactory (5/15) Introduction /15 marks Introduces the topic of the research report in an extremely engaging manner which arouses the reader's interest.