Identify the factor analysis hypothesises in null form

Assignment Help Applied Statistics
Reference no: EM132374024

Factor Analysis Assignment -

Introduction - Many researchers feel frustration with factor analysis (FA) at one time or another. Unlike most other inferential tests that have an unambiguous solution (i.e., a clear statistical decision is indicated based on interpretation of the calculated p-value), factor analysis does not most of the time. The ideal solution of having unambiguous and salient loading of all variables (i.e., test items or questions) on only one factor is often not attainable. It is possible to reject the null hypothesis of unidimensionality but not have clean loadings for all factors. You would note this situation in your results. Consequently, there is a measure of subjectivity in interpretation of factor analysis results and answering questions such as:

What are the optimum number of factors given the statistics and related theory?

What name should I give to the factors?

What questions should I retain?

What questions should I delete?

Don't assume that this assignment has one and only one correct solution - FA usually doesn't operate that way.

In the present assignment you will use factor analysis procedures on a test instrument that measures help self-efficacy, that is, the belief that one has the ability to help effectively. Help self-efficacy is measured by 15 questions created by the authors of the instrument used in this assignment. Three categories of help are represented in these 15 questions: six questions measure empathetic types of helping, four questions measure informational types of helping, four questions measure instrumental (i.e., doing things) types of helping, and the fifteenth question is open ended to allow any additional type of help given to be inserted. You will conduct a factor analysis to determine if the results of testing a sample of 517 subjects yield the three categories of self-efficacy that were originally hypothesized by the instrument's creators: empathetic types of helping, informational types of helping, and instrumental types of helping.

As far as the instrument's questions go, and in particular the fifteenth question, you need not consider the meanings of the options respondents are asked to consider in their evaluation of each question (otherwise we would need to conduct a literature review on the efficacy construct in order to understand the items and choices as they relate to theory, which I would prefer to avoid in this course). Suffice it to say that although question number 15 is an open-ended question according to the instrument's authors, the authors also provided choices. One issue that you must wrestle with is the role of question number 15 in any solution you recommend (assuming you provide evidence to support multidimensionality).

Specific course competencies assessed by this assignment -

  • Apply structural procedures using SPSS to analyze research data.
  • Apply the APA style in writing the results section of a research report.

Task - Conduct a factor analysis by completing the tasks listed in the evaluation checklist using the efficacy dataset.

Tasks -

Provide informationally adequate descriptive statistics.

Identify the factor analysis hypothesis(es) in null form.

Provide the results of your evaluations of multivariate normality. Identify how you evaluated this assumption.

Create and include a scree plot. Interpret the results.

Provide the results of your factor analysis. Use Maximum Likelihood Factoring with the Direct Oblimin method of rotation. Provide a rationale for use of these methods in this situation.

Conclusion - In this assignment you conducted factor analysis. You will sometimes encounter these procedures when you conduct or read research, particularly research involving the construct validity of measurement instruments.

Note - "For the KMO and Bartlett's Test table, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy should have a value of .871, and for the Goodness-of-fit Test table, the Chi-Square should have a value of 80.359 and a Sig. of .005. These values may vary depending on your selection for treating missing values - mine are based upon what should be the default of Missing Listwise."

Attachment:- Factor Analysis Assignment Files.rar

Reference no: EM132374024

Questions Cloud

Why is it important to use schemas in your daily life : What are some things you need to be aware of so that the schemas you have developed and use don't lead you astray?
What do the studies on cognitive maps involving rats : What do the studies on cognitive maps involving rats, bees, and pigeons teach us about human cognition?
Developing processes and programs to manage knowledge : The problem to be examined in this proposed study is that managers of aerospace organizations do not have an adequate understanding of organizational knowledge.
What is the independent variable : What is the independent variable? The independent variable is the hours the adolescents spent on social media.
Identify the factor analysis hypothesises in null form : Task - Conduct factor analysis by completing tasks listed in evaluation checklist using efficacy dataset. Identify factor analysis hypothesises in null form
In what ways did the study communicate the purpose : Using the Hunt Library EAGLEsearch function, identify a "Scholarly & Peer-Reviewed" article in your area of interest. Give a brief summary of the article.
What other knowledge do you think one needs to obtain : In order to treat patients with voice disorders, in addition to this class, what other knowledge do you think one needs to obtain to be prepared and proficient?
Processes that adults use to make decisions : Your instructor has asked you to explain to Anita why risk taking may peak during adolescence. What do you tell her?
Why would you consider a square watermelon an advantage : Read "Square Watermelons!" Operations in Practice case on page 122 of the course textbook and answer the following questions: Why would you consider a square.

Reviews

len2374024

9/21/2019 3:19:44 AM

Evaluation - Provide informationally adequate descriptive statistics. 6.0 marks. Identify the factor analysis hypothesis(es) in null form. 2.0 marks. Provide the results of your evaluations of multivariate normality. Identify how you evaluated this assumption. 6.0 marks. Create and include a scree plot. Interpret the results. 6.0 marks. Provide the results of your factor analysis. Use Maximum Likelihood Factoring with the Direct Oblimin method of rotation. Provide a rationale for use of these methods in this situation. 10.0 marks. Write a parsimonious results section that draws from the information you provided in response to the tasks above and that conforms to APA style. Include as a minimum an APA style table and an APA style figure. Make sure to address the instrument’s question number 15. Did you retain this variable in your final results? If so, why? If not, why not? 5.0 marks.

Write a Review

Applied Statistics Questions & Answers

  Determine the impact of research - construct the objective

Examine the research problem of this research - construct the objective/s of this research and determine the impact of this research.

  What is the cost of the test which will make us indifferent

We need to acquire a piece of equipment. However, we are uncertain about its reliability. It might need a low, medium or a high number of repairs during its life. The present value ("PV") of the costs of the equipment over its life would be as follow..

  Calculate the coefficient of determination

Calculate the coefficient of determination R2 for the simple linear regression model - create a criteria based on T to reject null hypothesis so that the type I error is controlled at α.

  Calculate the z scores

Calculate the Z scores. Are there any outliers?

  What kind of experiment

What kind of experiment

  What is the probability of getting a royal flush

FIT 5197 Modelling for Data Analysis Assignment, Monash University, Australia. What is the probability of getting a royal flush but where the cards ordered

  Summarise numerical variables using descriptive statistics

Produce a histogram for each of the above numerical variables to graphically display their distribution - Summarise each categorical variables Descriptive Statistics

  Functions of parametric statistical procedures

What would be the appropriate statistical procedure to test the following hypothesis:  "Triglyceride values are a good predictor of weight in obese adults." What are the functions of parametric statistical procedures?

  The coin lands either all heads or all tails

Toss the coin four times. If the coin lands either all heads or all tails, reject Ho: p=1/2 (the p denotes the chance for the coin to land on heads.) Complete parts a and b. a. what is the probability of a type 1 error for this procedure? b. if p=4/5..

  Prepare an analysis of the data using excel

Prepare an analysis of the data using Excel. You may create any pivot tables or cross tabulate any information you think is appropriate

  Approximately 20% of 1000 fish in a pond

Approximately 20% of 1000 fish in a pond are affected with a skin disease.  A random sample of 20 fish are selected.  What is the mean of the sampling distribution for the proportion of your sample that is infected?  What is the standard deviation of..

  For a normal distribution

For a normal distribution, the z-score boundary that separates the lowest 2.5% of the scores from the rest is z = -1.96

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd