Good quick response to any of the my query. Looks good quality and the expert reads the case and provided a proper response instead of rushing despite needed it after 5 hours of asking for help. Instructions were followed correctly, the assignment is prepared correctly too! Cool.

Summary/Concl usion /5 All elements are present and very well integrated. Conclusive present with good cohesive Components present and mostly well Most components present but Conclusion lacks relevance integrated not well summarized Reference style /5 Clear styles with excellent source Clear referencing Generally good Sometimes clear Lacks consistency with many errors of references. style referencing referencing style style

Potential damages /10 In depth use of a good range of relevant literature to address the points. Evidence of using relevant literature to address the points. Use of some relevant literature to address the points. Limited evidence of using relevant literature to address the point No evidence and literature to address points as required. Challenges /Issues /10 Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments Consistency logical and convincing Mostly consistent logical and convincing Adequate cohesion and conviction Argument is confused and disjointed Mitigation and countermeasure strategies /5 Thorough and comprehensive explanation of the solutions, to Good explanation of the solutions to the problem Enough explanation of the solution to Limited explanation to the solution of the problem No explanation for mitigation provided or discussed the problem defined the problem defined. defined. defined

Grade Mark HD 40-50 DI 35-39 CR 30-34 P 25-29 Fail <25 Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Executive Summary is relevant and soundly analyzed. Generally relevant and analyzed. Some relevance and briefly presented. This is not relevant to the assignment topic. Summary Concise and /5 specific to the topic Identification of threats and attacks /10 Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but Demonstrat ed ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriate ly Demonstrate d ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately Did not demonstrate ability to think critically and did reference did not source not source material reference reference material appropriately for material appropriately identification of appropriately threats

Identification of threats and attacks Student should identify and discuss in detail relevant security threats and attacks for the selected topic 10 Potential damages Student should list down and explain potential damages these threats could cause if exploited 10 Challenges/Issues Student should identify and relate challenges/issues faced by corporation to control these threats such as financial difficulties and budget constraints. 10 Mitigation and countermeasure strategies Student should discuss mitigation and countermeasure strategies relevant to threats identified in earlier part of this report 5 Summary/Conclusion Student should conclude how these threats and mitigation strategies is going to impact the networked information systems 5 Reference style Follow IEEE reference style 5 Total 50

All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page. The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style. Marking criteria: Example of marking criteria is shown in following table. Marks are allocated as follows: Section to be included in the report Description of the section Marks Executive Summary Student should describe purpose of report and statement of threats and attacks being discussed in report. 5