hi please let me know what will be the price for 3000 words. im waiting for the payment from my group members.. I will do the payment sooner as possible, thank you. Please be noted this is for postgraduate level ( masters).thanks. Hi there.. please note that I have received 0% similarity in this assignment.really thankful! this is a responsible answer. it included sufficient references. Thank you so much for the help!! it really was an outstanding work! I would totally use this service again (in a situation of despair!) hahaha. My mates also want to know about such service, but I feel jealous telling them your name :) hahaha just kidding... thanks for your support.

Score Very Good (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Referencing Correct referencing (Harvard) All quoted material in quotes and acknowledged. Mostly correct referencing (Harvard) All quoted material in quotes and acknowledged. All paraphrased material acknowledged. Mostly correct setting out reference list and bibliography included. Mostly correct referencing (Harvard) Some problems with quoted material and paraphrased material Some problems with the reference list or bibliography. Not all material correctly acknowledged. /5 marks All paraphrased material acknowledged. Some problems with the reference list or bibliography. Correctly set out reference list and bibliography included.

Score Very Good (17-20) Good (13-16) Satisfactory (10-12) Unsatisfactory (6-9) Development of Discussion /20 marks Logical, insightful, original discussion with well-connected paragraphs. Evidence of full engagement with the literature found, with relevant and detailed analysis. Detailed, original discussion develops logically with some connection between adjoining paragraphs. Understanding of reading shown. Some relevant analysis. Adequate discussion develops logically. Understanding of reading shown. Few relevant analysis. Inadequate discussion of issues and/or lacking in logical flow Little/no demonstrated understanding of reading. None/little discussion or analysis.

Score Very Good (9-10) Good (7-8) Satisfactory (5-6) Unsatisfactory (3-4) Evidence of Research /10 marks Substantial range of appropriate and current, supportive evidence Good range of appropriate and current, supportive evidence. Suitable range of supportive evidence used. Not always appropriate and/or current. Minimum cited. Insufficient range or number of supportive evidence used.

Score Very Good (17-20) Good (13-16) Satisfactory (10-12) Unsatisfactory (6-9) Criteria completion /20 Evidence of understanding of the nature and purpose of the business. Evidence of understanding of the implications for the company The chosen software/system has the capacity to address challenges identified within the business. Evidence of understanding of the implications for the company You gain marks for ensuring that all of the points mentioned above as challenges within the business are covered in your report by the chosen software / system.

Score Very Good (12-15) Good (9-11) Satisfactory (8-10) Unsatisfactory (5-7) Introduction /15 marks Introduces the topic of the research report in an extremely engaging manner which arouses the reader's interest. Gives a detailed general background and indicates the overall "plan". Introduces the topic of the research report in an engaging manner which arouses the reader's interest. Gives some general background and indicates the overall "plan" of the report. Satisfactorily introduces the topic of the research report. Gives a general background. Indicates the overall "plan" of the report. Introduces the topic of the research report, but omits a general background of the topic and/or the overall "plan" of the report.

Score Very Good (12-15) Good (9-11) Satisfactory (8-10) Unsatisfactory (5-7) Presentation and writing style /15 marks Information is well organized. Correct layout including times new roman, font size 12 or calibri, font size10, double spaced. About the right length. Very well written, excellent paraphrasing and proper grammar and punctuation are used throughout. Information is organized, Correct layout including times new roman, font size 12 or calibri, font size10, double spaced. About the right length. Well written, some paraphrasing and proper grammar and punctuation Information is somewhat organized, Some elements of layout or length incorrect. Proper grammar and punctuation mostly used, but overuse of direct quotes. Information is poorly organized, Some elements of layout or length incorrect. Proper grammar and punctuation not always used. Excessive overuse of direct quotes

Score Very Good (9-10) Good (7-8) Satisfactory (5-6) Unsatisfactory (3-4) Fits with criteria /10 Appropriately choose a technology that fits. Evidence of good understanding of the nature and purpose of the business Evidence of understanding of the nature and purpose of the business Adequacy of understanding of the nature and purpose of the business Reports that choose systems/software not relevant will lose marks from this category.

The research should include a list of at least 7-10 references and a bibliography of the wider reading done to familiarize oneself with the topic. Submission: • Soft copy to self-check and Final Submission with cover sheet You are reminded to read the “Plagiarism” section of the course description. Your research should be a synthesis of ideas from a variety of sources expressed in your own words. All reports must use the Harvard referencing style. Marking rubrics are attached.