Deliverables 1-7 8-15 16-23 24-30 Mark SCM Examples Irrelevant SCM Examples Satisfactory choice of SCM Examples Relevant SCM Examples without appropriate justification. Relevant SCM Examples with appropriate justification. Deliverables 1-7 8-15 16-20 21-25 Mark Creation of Material master, Supplier master, PO, GR and IR. Documents creation without using configured ORG structure. Able to create documents using configured ORG structure with errors. Satisfactory documents creation without data. Complete and accurate documents creation in all aspects

Deliverables 0 1-6 10 Mark Work Proposal No Submission Proposal is incomplete but has relevant information Complete and satisfactory proposal. Deliverables 1-7 8-15 16-20 21-25 Mark Customize(defin ing and assignments) ORG structure Not able to customize ORG structure. Able to define ORG structure with some errors. Able to define and assign ORG structure. Complete and accurate defining and assignments of ORG structure

90-100% Outstanding Focused and comprehensive engagement with the question, showing evidence of in-depth understanding of the issues. Extremely clearly structured and demonstrating a coherent argument throughout. Evidence of wide, independent reading. No obvious errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate. 80-89% Excellent Detailed identification of the issues with evidence of clear understanding of the issues. Well-structured with evidence of independent reading supporting the argument. Very few errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate.

The total amount of quoted material (direct quotations) in any form of student work from all sources put together should not exceed 10%. The total amount of similar material in any form of student work from a single source should not exceed 7 percent. However, cases having a similarity of less than 7 percent in such cases may still be investigated by the faculty depending on the seriousness of the case. If faculty member find enough merit in the case of a student work with a similarity (with a single source) of more than 7 percent as not a case of plagiarism, the faculty member should provide detailed comments/remarks to justify the case.

Heading should be with Font Size 14, Bold, Underline Use Diagrams and Examples to explain your topic. Copy paste from the Internet is strictly not acceptable. Reference should be included in the last page as follows Author name, Book Title, Publisher, Year in case of books In case of web site references type the full path of the web page with referenced date In case of magazines/ periodicals type article name, magazine name, Issue Number and date.

Each student has to work individually. No two or more students can work together. Each student has to use their SAP ERP logon IDs while working in the case study. Screenshots should be provided while using SAP ERP System. Guidelines Follow the guidelines mentioned below for your assignment. Assignment documentation/report should be typed. Assignment documentation/report should be uploaded in Moodle and will undergo plagiarism detection test through Turnitin (a plagiarism detection tool) A screenshots should be taken for those questions solved by SAP ERP System. Handwritten assignments will not be accepted Assignment should have a Title Page. Title Page should contain the following information. Assignment Name Session Student name Student ID It should have Table of Contents Use page numbers Assignment should be typed in your own words using Times New Roman font size 12.