Reference no: EM133235233
Assignment:
Benchmark -Critical Thinking Essay
Right To Die
1. Briefly analyze and compare the claims of both articles as well as the background of the controversy and how it became controversial. Include how historical perspectives and theories add to the controversy.
2. Examine the evidence given in the articles and explain which article creates a stronger argument. You are not choosing a side that supports your beliefs. Describe why one article's argument is stronger than the other. Give examples from both, include how current perspectives and theories support your rationale.
3. Identify any logic fallacies that exist in both and explain what makes them logic fallacies
4. Describe how the controversy you chose is applicable and significant to the world.
Need four scholarly references to support your claim.
Articles that need to be used :
Goligher ,E., C., Cigolini, M., Cormier, A., Donnelly, S., Ferrier, C., Gorshkov-Cantacuzene,V.,A.,and Quinlan,J.(2019) Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are unethical acts. World Medical Journal, 65(1),34-37.
Calabro, R.S., Naro, A., DeLuca, R.,Russo,M.,Caccamo,,L.,Manuli,A., andBramanti,P. (2016) The right to die in chronic disorders of consciousness: Can we avoid the slippery slope argument? Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience, 13(11-12),12-24.