Identify facts that support your ruling

Assignment Help Other Subject

Reference no: EM133425581

Question: You are a District Court Judge in Hays County, TEXAS. You are presiding over a Motion to Suppress Confession hearing in the case of The State of TEXAS vs. Fred. Fred has been indicated for arson of a computer business where he was formerly employed. According to the information in the Court's file, the confession is the only evidence against Fred.

The question before you as the Judge is whether Fred was "in custody" at the time of his interrogation which would have required the detectives to provide the Miranda warnings. If you find that Fred was in custody, then his confession should be suppressed because of the Miranda violation. If you find that Fred was NOT in custody, then his confession should be admitted. You should explain the reasoning for your ruling including the standard you used. You should identify facts that support your ruling.

Reference no: EM133425581

Questions Cloud

State the null and alternative hypotheses : Assume the population is normally distributed. Is there evidence at the 0.05 level that the boards are too long and need to be trimmed? Step 1 of 6

Standard binary between monogamy and non-monogamy : What do you take Clardy's central thesis to be? In what way does his thesis complicate the standard binary between monogamy and non-monogamy?

Is electronic monitoring worth the effort : How else might the corrections system go about monitoring offenders in the community if not through electronic monitoring? In your opinion, is it a good idea

How do these concepts influence approaches to conflict : Consider the concept of forgiveness and reconciliation. How do these concepts influence approaches to conflict and negotiation

Identify facts that support your ruling : You are a District Court Judge in Hays County, TEXAS. You are presiding over a Motion to Suppress Confession hearing in the case of The State of TEXAS vs. Fred

Existence of the universe requires an explanation : The First Cause argument rests on the fundamental claim that the existence of the universe requires an explanation.

Define interrogations with scholarly research : Define interrogations and confessions with scholarly research, admissions, confessions and statements. Next, compare and contrast, with scholarly research

Show why that type of special needs search : Show why that type of Special Needs Search is reasonable because the governmental interest outweighs individual privacy interests

Evaluate the criteria fel uses to assign managers to project : Evaluate the criteria FEL uses to assign managers to project teams. What efficiencies do these criteria create? What are the resulting problems?

User Account

All Pages