I am exceptionally suspicious when I was giving over my paper to them. But thanks god, who helped me to get the authentic task help in the wake of being swindled by many other services. You are astonishing support team, and I am proposing everybody to get help from Expertsmind.

Hii..i have to order two assignments more today so i want some concession because 120 usd is too much so pls give me some concession Ok thanks Hi.within 3 hours i have to submit the assignment of mn502 Thanks alot

Reference style /5 Clear styles with excellent source of references. Clear referencing style Generally good referencing style Sometimes clear referencing style Lacks consistency with many errors Presentation slides /4 Well organised and resourceful Organised and resourceful Resourceful but could be better organised Resourceful slides Neither resourceful nor well organised Oral Presentation /4 Good delivery, easy to follow and good interaction Delivered, easy to follow and provided a level of interaction Delivered and provided a level of interaction Delivered No oral presentation

Analyse Critically /6 Exceptional discussion on security vulnerabilities for the system. Identifying highly sophisticated and well referenced vulnerabilities Exceptional discussion on security vulnerabilities for the system. Discussion on three security vulnerabilities Discussion on Two security vulnerabilities Unable to identify security vulnerabilities Propose a possible solution /6 Advance discussion on threats mitigation using latest technologies and procedures Good discussion on threats mitigation using technologies and procedures Good discussion on threats and mitigation Discussion on threats and mitigation Lacking discussion on threats and mitigation Report Layout /5 Well designed layout and proper formatting in IEEE Conference Style Well designed layout in IEEE Conference style Layout in IEEE Conference style Report layout and formatted but not in IEEE Conference style Report lacks a proper layout

Marking Rubric for Assignment #2: Total Marks 50 Grade Mark HD 40-50 DI 35-39 CR 30-34 P 25-29 Fail <25 Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Introduction /5 All topics are pertinent and covered in depth. Ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated Topics are relevant and soundly analysed. Generally relevant and analysed. Some relevance and briefly presented. This is not relevant to the assignment topic. Literature Review /15 Finding is clearly linked and well justified Finding is clearly linked and justified Finding is linked and convincing Finding is not linked and unjustified Finding is not available

Propose a possible solution Discuss a threat mitigation technique for one of the security vulnerability 6 Report Layout The report should be written in IEEE conference format 5 Reference style Follow IEEE reference style 5 Presentation Slides The presentation slides should be well organised and clear. 4 Oral Presentation Delivery of the presentation 4 Total 50

Submission Guidelines The assignment should be submitted on the Moodle in two separate files: 1. The report should be submitted as a Word file 2. The presentation should be submitted as a PPT file Marking criteria: Section to be included in the report Description of the section Marks Introduction Introduction of Internet of Things 5 Literature Review Literature review of Internet of Things 15 Analyse critically Analyse critically, three security vulnerabilities of Internet of Things. 6