Reference no: EM133498638
1. Scroll to the bottom of the page and click on Clinical Ethics and Law: Case 2
You will be reading Case Study 2: Surrogate Decision-Maker with Potential Conflict of Interest
After reading it please answer the following question:
In your opinion, what are the ethical parameters that you noted from reading the case?
2. Your internship offers you the opportunity to work alongside professionals in the field, and use their expertise and feedback to guide your steps. In this discussion, discuss what types of feedback you have been provided by the professionals that you are working with. Do you find the feedback valuable? What are your responses when provided feedback from professionals in the organization, whether supervisor feedback or peer feedback. How can you exhibit professional reactions to feedback when it is provided?
3. I wanted to share a resource with you that discusses how to respond/react to constructive feedback. It may help you answer the last question of the discussion this week.
4. Communicating Possible Solutions
Use this week's discussion as an opportunity to examine the literature for possible correlations with your original research problem.
- Identify and discuss at least five relevant facts ascertained from your literary review that may correlate with your original research problem or topic.
- Identify any gaps in the research.
- Identify any conflicting assertions or theories in the research.
- Based on your literature review, brainstorm three possible solutions which may address your original research problem.
- Share your recommendations supported with scholarly evidence.
- Explain how these recommendations may address the original research problem.