Criterion 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 Score All APA components are in place, research is used correctly, and citation is used correctly. No references were used and plagiarism was found within paper and/or title page, header, or references page missing. At least two references are missing and/or were used too frequently and/or contained citation errors. Omission of title page, header, or references page. At least one reference is missing and/or references were used too frequently and/or contained citation errors. Omission of title page, header, or references page. References are used a little too frequently and/or contain errors with citation. Omission of title page, header, or references page. References are used appropriately and support ideas and main points. Title page, header, and references page provided.

Criterion 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 Score Proofreading is evident as paper contains no spelling or grammatical errors. Spelling and grammar errors are so prominent that they distract the reader. Spelling and grammar errors are numerous. May distract reader from the message. Spelling and grammar errors are evident but infrequent. Spelling and grammar errors are rare and do not distract the reader from the message. No spelling or grammar errors. Defines what a leadership style inventory is.* Identifies obstacles that must be overcome in order find success in a CEO role.* Makes recommendations how leadership style is used to gain acceptance within the corporate culture.*

Grading Rubric Points 0--1 2--3 4--5 6--7 8--9 Criterion* *Indicates research should be provided to support answer. Module 03 Written Assignment – Style Inventory and Grayson Chemical Score Answer submitted does not address the question, is too difficult to understand as written, or is too brief to evaluate level of mastery. Does not completely answer all components of the question and/or provides little to no research to defend main points. Response is inadequate in length and required additional discussion. Answers some components of the question but may have omitted some information. Research is somewhat lacking to defend main points. Response is short and could have benefited from more discussion. Answers all components of the question somewhat completely and provides some research to defend main points. Response may be somewhat short in length. Answers all components of the question thoroughly and provides solid research to defend main points.