Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
Assessment Task
You are required to analyse the scenario given on page 3 and discuss the following issues in the specified weeks by contributing to the Group Discussion Forum of your group.
a) Ethical issues related to mishandling of various information resources produced at Smart Software Pty Ltd by the staff members.
b) The measures that Smart Software Pty Ltd should take to prevent its staff members from handling information unethically. (Due in week 6).
c) Identification of information assets of Smart Software Pty Ltd. (Due in week 7).
d) Identification of InfoSec risks associated with these information assets. (Due in week 8).
e) The risk management framework(s) that could be adopted to manage the InfoSec risks in Smart Software Pty Ltd. (Due in week 9).
Check the unit website at least once a week for further information relating to this assessment task. Please ensure that you write your report in your own words to avoid possible plagiarism and copyright violation.
Week 9 Very relevant and detailed information. Very relevant information but not enough detail. Relevant but could be improved. Just summarising or paraphrasing the contributions of others in the group. No new contribution. Just agreeing or disagreeing to others in the group. Not relevant contribution.. Not attempted. 5 Plagiarism penalty Late submission penalty Total 25
Week 7 Very relevant and detailed information. Very relevant information but not enough detail. Relevant but could be improved. Just summarising or paraphrasing the contributions of others in the group. No new contribution. Just agreeing or disagreeing to others in the group. Not relevant contribution.. Not attempted. 5 Week 8 Very relevant and detailed information. Very relevant information but not enough detail. Relevant but could be improved. Just summarising or paraphrasing the contributions of others in the group. No new contribution. Just agreeing or disagreeing to others in the group. Not relevant contribution.. Not attempted. 5
Week 5 Very relevant and detailed information. Very relevant information but not enough detail. Relevant but could be improved. Just summarising or paraphrasing the contributions of others in the group. No new contribution. Just agreeing or disagreeing to others in the group. Not relevant contribution. Not attempted. 5 Week 6 Very relevant and detailed information. Very relevant information but not enough detail. Relevant but could be improved. Just summarising or paraphrasing the contributions of others in the group. No new contribution. Just agreeing or disagreeing to others in the group. Not relevant contribution.. Not attempted. 5
Assessment Criteria Each one of you are assessed individually on your ability to address the issues given in the assessment tasks and make meaningful contributions to the Group Discussion Forum of your group in Moodle in the specified weeks. Please note that your contributions should be novel or beyond what has already been contributed by the others in your group. The marking criteria for Assessment Item 2 are provided on page 4. You need to familiarise yourself with the marking criteria to ensure that you complete this assessment task timely and properly.
This assessment task relates to Unit Learning Outcomes 1 and 5 and can be undertaken in a group of up to 4 members. Distance students can form groups with on-campus students or can undertake the assessment individually. You will analyse the scenario given on page 3 and discuss the issues given in the assessment tasks below by contributing to the Group Discussion Forum of your group in Moodle during weeks 5, 6, 7, 8 & 9.
What negative outcomes will likely occur if the patient does not receive the care offered by the allied health provider?
In collaboration with your approved course mentor, you will identify a specific evidence-based practice proposal topic for the capstone project.
You have been approached by the editor of Gentlemen’s Magazine/or Women’s Magazine) to carry out a research study. The magazine has been unsuccessful in attracting shoe manufacturers as advertisers. When the sales force tried to secure advertising fr..
What are some similarities and differences between skimming pricing, prestige pricing, and above-market pricing?
Were there any developmental issues in Scott Peterson's life to preemptively create the behavior of a killer?
Diversity in Early Care and Education, Janet Gonzalez-Mena introduces an individualist-collectivist framework as a means of understanding differences.
How should we categorise Facebook? Is it mass communication, interpersonal communication or popular communication?
AFTER you've completed the song analyses, THEN you synthesize the information. What do the song analyses tell you about the artist's views? How does that connect with the artist's life/journey? Was there a significant incident in the person's lif..
How might Eastern philosophical traditions enhance positive psychology's ideas about the meaning and the means of a good life?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of socialized medicine? What barriers exist to having universal health care in the United States?
Analyze the implications of myths regarding suicidal clients.
What can be possible examples where we might now look at culture differently.
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +1-415-670-9521
Phone: +1-415-670-9521
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd