Reference no: EM133452745

Question 1: How would you explain the data set #2 below?

Question 2: What trends do you notice in the length of latencies over time in data set #2?

Question 3: How would you compare data set #1 and #2? Do you notice any changes?

Question 4: How would you interpret the results (latencies) in terms of the relative strength of the stimulus?

Question 5: How is this data set #2 different from data set #1?

Question 6 : What does the data mean in terms of classical conditioning?

Data set #1 is below:

1. 6.85 seconds

2. 31.10 seconds

3. 8.43 seconds

4. 16.35 seconds

5. 6:39.69 seconds

6. 1:14.32 seconds

 

Data set #2 is below:

1. 3.42 seconds

2. 34.47 seconds

3. 39.60 seconds

4. 10.42 seconds

5. 41.07 seconds

6. 13.50 seconds

7. 5.79 seconds

8. 21.72 seconds

9. 3.72 seconds

10. 3.86 seconds

11. 4.58 seconds