Reference no: EM133649858

Assignment:

You are a United States Senator. You represent your home state. The House of Representatives has sent the Senate a bill that will make college education free for any American who wants one. It is now up to the Senate to pass it and send it to the president to be signed into law. You are also a businessperson, and like most others in America, you paid for your own education with loans. The arguments for the benefits of an education without debt are pretty obvious.

• Reducing indebtedness
• Strengthening the economy by producing a more educated workforce
• Providing opportunities for those of limited financial means
• At the same time, there are some reasons against it too.
• Asking taxpayers to subsidize something that doesn't directly benefit them
• Not addressing the underlying cause of high college tuition and possibly encouraging colleges to raise tuition rates
• Providing a benefit that the wealthy and upper-middle class don't need

As a senator, you must research (and cite) to understand the numbers involved (e.g., potential number of students who will benefit, potential dollars in tax burden for individuals and businesses, and potential number of ex-students who've paid off or are paying off their student loan debt).

The majority rules here, so you must be extra careful, as a utilitarian, not to abuse that power. You are looking out for the most happiness for the most people, regardless of any personal or procedural beliefs.

1. How would a utilitarian senator vote on this dilemma? Why?
2. How would the views of the people of the state you represent influence your vote? In other words, if the majority were in favor, would you vote in favor of it too?
3. Would a Kantian vote differently than a utilitarian? Why or why not?