How would a believer use anselms ontological proof to show

Reference no: EM133313947

Question: Imagine a conversation between a believer and an atheist. How would a believer use Anselm's ontological proof to show the atheist's lack of belief is untenable? How would the atheist reply to such an argument? Who do you think would wind up with the better argument? Why?

Reference no: EM133313947

Questions Cloud

Which is more important for artists and natural scientists : Does it matter if our acquisition of knowledge happens in "bubbles" where some information and voices are excluded? refer to two different areas of knowledge

What is import supply curve and export demand curve : What is an import supply curve? How do such curves relate to the determination of the equilibrium world price of a tradable good?

What you consider to be significant landmarks of baroque era : what you consider to be significant landmarks of the Baroque era? Remember, landmarks do not have to be physical or visual things. Were these landmarks products

Contribution of behavioural economics to discussion : You should consider the work of Thorstein Veblen and the contribution of behavioural economics to the discussion.

How would a believer use anselms ontological proof to show : How would a believer use Anselm's ontological proof to show the atheist's lack of belief is untenable? How would the atheist reply to such an argument?

Rational consumer choice model : Assess the usefulness of the Rational Consumer Choice model in predicting the behaviourof consumers with a specific set of preferences and a given budget.

What does climate change mean : What does climate change mean ? What is the difference between climate and weather? How does accumulation of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere lead to a warming

Netflix is moving from strictly subscription model : Netflix is moving from a strictly subscription model to a model where customers have the choice of subscribing to a streaming service

Follow the rules or mandates to achieve peace : Follow the rules/mandates to achieve peace - parting with the right to all things (that exist in the state of nature) and agreeing to a state of liberty

User Account

All Pages